.png){kind=icon}
返回
Regulating Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) May Harm Consumers
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1287/mksc.2022.0396.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
The most recent artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms lack interpretability. Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) aims to address this by explaining AI decisions to customers. Although it is commonly believed that the requirement of fully transparent XAI enhances consumer surplus, our paper challenges this view. We present a gametheoretic model where a policymaker maximizes consumer surplus in a duopoly market with heterogeneous customer preferences. Our model integrates AI accuracy, explanation depth, and method. We find that partial explanations can be an equilibrium in an unregulated setting. Furthermore, we identify scenarios where customers' and firms' desires for full explanation are misaligned. In these cases, regulating full explanations may not be socially optimal and could worsen the outcomes for firms and consumers. Flexible XAI policies outperform both full transparency and unregulated extremes.
Keyword:
machine learning
explainable AI
economics of AI
regulation
fairness
期刊
IF:
10.1
论文数:
3.4K
被引数:
2.2W
机构
引用论文
IDO as a drug target for cancer immunotherapy: recent developments in IDO inhibitors discovery.png)
RSC Advances
RSC AdvancesIF0
PREAI
分享收藏Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead停止解释高风险决策的黑盒机器学习模型，而改用可解释的模型
OAAI
OAAI分享收藏Interpretable neural networks based on continuous-valued logic and multicriteria decision operators基于连续值逻辑和多准则决策算子的可解释神经网络OAAI
OAAI分享收藏
查看更多内容