.png){kind=icon}
返回
Scholarly Concentration Program Development: A Generalizable, Data-Driven Approach
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1097/ACM.0000000000001362.png)
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Purpose Scholarly concentration programs-also known as scholarly projects, pathways, tracks, or pursuits-are increasingly common in U.S. medical schools. However, systematic, data-driven program development methods have not been described. Method The authors examined scholarly concentration programs at U.S. medical schools that U.S. News & World Report ranked as top 25 for research or primary care (n = 43 institutions), coding concentrations and mission statements. Subsequently, the authors conducted a targeted needs assessment via a studentled, institution-wide survey, eliciting learners' preferences for 10 Pathways (i.e., concentrations) and 30 Topics (i.e., potential content) augmenting core curricula at their institution. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and a capacity optimization algorithm characterized best institutional options for learner-focused Pathway development. Results The authors identified scholarly concentration programs at 32 of 43 medical schools (74%), comprising 199 distinct concentrations (mean concentrations per program: 6.2, mode: 5, range: 1-16). Thematic analysis identified 10 content domains; most common were Global/Public Health (30 institutions; 94%) and Clinical/Translational Research (26 institutions; 81%). The institutional needs assessment (n = 468 medical students; response rate 60% overall, 97% among first-year students) demonstrated myriad student preferences for Pathways and Topics. EFA of Topic preferences identified eight factors, systematically related to Pathway preferences, informing content development. Capacity modeling indicated that offering six Pathways could guarantee 95% of first-year students (162/171) their first-or second-choice Pathway. Conclusions This study demonstrates a generalizable, data-driven approach to scholarly concentration program development that reflects student preferences and institutional strengths, while optimizing program diversity within capacity constraints.
Keyword:
MEDICAL-SCHOOL
STUDENTS
PROJECT
NUMBER
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
5.2
论文数:
1.2W
被引数:
2.4W
机构
引用论文
Developing a Professional Pathway in Health Equity to Facilitate Curricular Transformation at the University of Michigan Medical School.png)
ACADEMIC MEDICINEOAAI
ACADEMIC MEDICINEIF5.2
OAAI分享收藏How to Measure Success: The Impact of Scholarly Concentrations on Students-A Literature ReviewACADEMIC MEDICINEOAAI
ACADEMIC MEDICINEIF5.2
OAAI分享收藏分享收藏Actuation Challenges in the More Electric Aircraft: Overcoming Hurdles in the Electrification of Actuation Systems电动飞机的驱动挑战: 克服驱动系统电气化的障碍
PREAI
分享收藏Factor Analysis Methods and Validity Evidence: A Review of Instrument Development Across the Medical Education ContinuumACADEMIC MEDICINE
OAAI
ACADEMIC MEDICINEIF5.2
OAAI分享收藏Engaging Students in Dedicated Research and Scholarship During Medical School: The Long-Term Experiences at Duke and StanfordACADEMIC MEDICINEOAAI
ACADEMIC MEDICINEIF5.2
OAAI分享收藏Required vs. Elective Research and In-Depth Scholarship Programs in the Medical Student CurriculumACADEMIC MEDICINEOAAI
ACADEMIC MEDICINEIF5.2
OAAI分享收藏The Emphasis Program: A Scholarly Concentrations Program at Vanderbilt University School of MedicineACADEMIC MEDICINEOAAI
ACADEMIC MEDICINEIF5.2
OAAI分享收藏
查看更多内容