返回
Task-Dependent Algorithm Aversion
DOI:10.1177/0022243719851788.png)
摘要
En 中文
Research suggests that consumers are averse to relying on algorithms to perform tasks that are typically done by humans, despite the fact that algorithms often perform better. The authors explore when and why this is true in a wide variety of domains. They find that algorithms are trusted and relied on less for tasks that seem subjective (vs. objective) in nature. However, they show that perceived task objectivity is malleable and that increasing a task's perceived objectivity increases trust in and use of algorithms for that task. Consumers mistakenly believe that algorithms lack the abilities required to perform subjective tasks. Increasing algorithms' perceived affective human-likeness is therefore effective at increasing the use of algorithms for subjective tasks. These findings are supported by the results of four online lab studies with over 1,400 participants and two online field studies with over 56,000 participants. The results provide insights into when and why consumers are likely to use algorithms and how marketers can increase their use when they outperform humans.
Keyword:
algorithms
new products
technology adoption
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
J
IF:
5
论文数:
2.6K
被引数:
2.9W
机构
引用论文
When Do People Rely on Affective and Cognitive Feelings in Judgment? A Review人们什么时候依赖情感和认知感受来进行判断?一个审查
Ribosomal DNA phylogenies ofCyathus: Is the current infrageneric classification appropriate?
Mycologia
IF0

