THEORIZING WITH MICROHISTORY

doi:10.5465/amr.2019.0176

2023-10-01

PRE

Andrew Hargadon *

R. Daniel Wadhwani

DOI：10.5465/amr.2019.0176

原文链接

原文求助

摘要

En 中文

Management and organization studies have long been interested in the social contexts and enduring consequences of individual and collective action. Yet, empirically observing both the situated nature of actions and their ultimate consequences remains challenging. In this paper, we describe microhistory as a complementary approach to grounded and longitudinal studies that reconciles situated action in time with its broader consequences over time. Microhistorical research involves the reflexive use of dual temporal frames: a microtemporal frame suited to an empirically grounded study of individuals in time and a macrotemporal frame accounting for processes of continuity and change in social structures over time. We describe the epistemology, method, and form inherent in theorizing with microhistory and consider its potential for management researchers. Microhistory's approach, we recognize, is well-suited to several phenomena that remain elusive to contemporaneous and longitudinal studies, such as exceptional normal actions, unintended consequences, nonlinear and emergent processes, contingent processes, and unobserved or inconceivable processes. Finally, we consider how microhistory's reflexive temporality offers management scholars opportunities to situate ourselves and our own theorizing in time and to account for evolving consequences over time.

Keyword:

ORGANIZATIONAL HISTORY

INSTITUTIONAL CHANGE

MICRO

STRATEGY

CLUES

WORK