.png){kind=icon}
返回
Thinking styles in implicit and explicit learning
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1016/j.lindif.2012.10.014.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
This study investigated whether individual differences in thinking styles influence explicit and implicit learning. Eighty-seven university students in China participated in this study. Results indicated that performance in the explicit learning condition was positively associated with Type I thinking styles (i.e. legislative and liberal styles) and the internal style and negatively associated with a Type II thinking style (i.e. conservative style) and the external style. There was no significant relationship between thinking styles and performance in the implicit learning condition. Taken together, these findings suggest that implicit and explicit learning are distinct, each influenced by different individual difference variables. It also provides support to the value-laden nature of styles, giving further evidence to the adaptiveness of Type I over Type II styles. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Keyword:
Implicit learning
Explicit learning
Thinking styles
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
9
论文数:
2.6K
被引数:
9.0K
机构
引用论文
分享收藏
Beyond IQ: A latent state-trait analysis of general intelligence, dynamic decision making, and implicit learning.png)
INTELLIGENCE
INTELLIGENCEIF2.8
PREAI
分享收藏分享收藏
查看更多内容