arrow
Return

2018 Consensus framework for good assessment

delete2018-10-09
delete181
PRE
AI
J
John J. Norcini *
M
M. Brownell Anderson
V
Valdes Roberto Bóllela
V
Vanessa Burch
M
Manuel João Costa
R
Robbert Duvivier
R
Richard Hays
M
Maria Felisa Palacios Mackay
T
Trudie Roberts
D
David B. Swanson
DOI:10.1080/0142159X.2018.1500016delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Introduction: In 2010, the Ottawa Conference produced a set of consensus criteria for good assessment. These were well received and since then the working group monitored their use. As part of the 2010 report, it was recommended that consideration be given in the future to preparing similar criteria for systems of assessment. Recent developments in the field suggest that it would be timely to undertake that task and so the working group was reconvened, with changes in membership to reflect broad global representation.Methods: Consideration was given to whether the initially proposed criteria continued to be appropriate for single assessments and the group believed that they were. Consequently, we reiterate the criteria that apply to individual assessments and duplicate relevant portions of the 2010 report.Results and discussion: This paper also presents a new set of criteria that apply to systems of assessment and, recognizing the challenges of implementation, offers several issues for further consideration. Among these issues are the increasing diversity of candidates and programs, the importance of legal defensibility in high stakes assessments, globalization and the interest in portable recognition of medical training, and the interest among employers and patients in how medical education is delivered and how progression decisions are made.
Keywords:
RECOMMENDATIONS
STATEMENT
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

M
Medical Teacher
IF:
4.4
Papers:
6.6K
Citations:
1.4W

Organization

U
University of Calgary
Scholars:
3.8W
Papers: 3.3W
Citations: 52
U
universidade do minho
Scholars:
1.1W
Papers: 1.1W
Citations: 10
U
universidade cidade de sao paulo
Scholars:
557
Papers: 420
Citations: 0
P
Parnassia Psychiatric Institute
Scholars:
519
Papers: 474
Citations: 3
U
University of Tasmania
Scholars:
1.3W
Papers: 1.3W
Citations: 1.8W
U
University of Cape Town
Scholars:
1.8W
Papers: 1.6W
Citations: 31
U
university of leeds
Scholars:
3.6W
Papers: 3.3W
Citations: 45
U
universidade de sao paulo
Scholars:
10.6W
Papers: 6.7W
Citations: 93
researcher View more organizations
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

Twelve Tips for programmatic assessment
err2014-11-20
err207
PREAI
errvan der Vleuten, C. P. M.; Schuwirth, L. W. T.; Driessen, E. W.; Govaerts, M. J. B.; Heeneman, S.
errShare
errSave
Criteria for good assessment: Consensus statement and recommendations from the Ottawa 2010 Conference
err2011-02-23
err365
errOAAI
errNorcini, John; Anderson, Brownell; Bollela, Valdes; Burch, Vanessa; Costa, Manuel Joao; Duvivier, Robbert; Galbraith, Robert; Hays, Richard; Kent, Athol; Perrott, Vanessa; Roberts, Trudie
errShare
errSave
Assessment for selection for the health care professions and specialty training: Consensus statement and recommendations from the Ottawa 2010 Conference
err2011-02-23
err178
PREAI
errPrideaux, David; Roberts, Chris; Eva, Kevin; Centeno, Angel; Mccrorie, Peter; Mcmanus, Chris; Patterson, Fiona; Powis, David; Tekian, Ara; Wilkinson, David
errShare
errSave
errShare
errSave
Developing the role of big data and analytics in health professional education
err2014-02-03
err121
PREAI
errEllaway, Rachel H.; Pusic, Martin V.; Galbraith, Robert M.; Cameron, Terri
errShare
errSave
errShare
errSave
errShare
errSave
researcher View more