Complicating Choice

doi:10.1509/jmkr.48.2.308

Return

Complicating Choice

2011-04-01

PRE

Rom Y. Schrift *

Oded Netzer

Ran Kivetz

DOI：10.1509/jmkr.48.2.308

Original

Original request for help

Save

Abstract

En 中文

A great deal of research in consumer decision making and social cognition has explored consumers' attempts to simplify choices by bolstering their tentative choice candidate and/or denigrating the other alternatives. The current research investigates a diametrically opposed process, whereby consumers complicate their decisions. The authors demonstrate that to complicate their choices, consumers increase choice conflict by overweighting small disadvantages of superior alternatives, converging overall evaluations of alternatives, reversing preference ordering, and even choosing less preferred alternatives. Furthermore, the results from five studies support a unifying theoretical framework: the effort compatibility principle. Specifically, the authors argue that consumers strive for compatibility between the effort they anticipate and the effort that they actually exert. When a decision seems more difficult than initially expected, a simplifying process ensues. However, when the decision seems easier to resolve than anticipated (e.g., when consumers face an important yet easy choice), consumers artificially increase their effort.

Keywords:

complicating behavior

predecisional processing

metacognition

choice conflict

bolstering

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.