arrow
Return

Critical assessment of missense variant effect predictors on disease-relevant variant data

delete2025-03-01
delete1
delete
OA
AI
R
Ruchir Rastogi
R
Ryan Chung
S
Sindy Li
C
Chang Li
K
Kyoungyeul Lee
J
Junwoo Woo
D
Dongwook Kim
C
Changwon Keum
G
Giulia Babbi
P
Pier Luigi Martelli
C
Castrense Savojardo
R
Rita Casadio
K
Kirsley Chennen
T
Thomas Weber
O
Olivier Poch
F
François Ancien
G
Gabriel Cia
F
Fabrizio Pucci
D
Daniele Raimondi
W
Wim Vranken
M
Marianne Rooman
C
Céline Marquet
T
Tobias Olenyi
B
Burkhard Rost
G
Gaia Andreoletti
A
Akash Kamandula
Y
Yisu Peng
C
Constantina Bakolitsa
M
Matthew Mort
D
D.N. Cooper
T
Timothy Bergquist
V
Vikas Pejaver
X
Xiaoming Liu
P
Predrag Radivojac
S
Steven E. Brenner *
N
Nilah M. Ioannidis *
DOI:10.1007/s00439-025-02732-2delete
deleteOriginal
deleteShare
deleteSave
View PDF
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Regular, systematic, and independent assessments of computational tools that are used to predict the pathogenicity of missense variants are necessary to evaluate their clinical and research utility and guide future improvements. The Critical Assessment of Genome Interpretation (CAGI) conducts the ongoing Annotate-All-Missense (Missense Marathon) challenge, in which missense variant effect predictors (also called variant impact predictors) are evaluated on missense variants added to disease-relevant databases following the prediction submission deadline. Here we assess predictors submitted to the CAGI 6 Annotate-All-Missense challenge, predictors commonly used in clinical genetics, and recently developed deep learning methods. We examine performance across a range of settings relevant for clinical and research applications, focusing on different subsets of the evaluation data as well as high-specificity and high-sensitivity regimes. Our evaluations reveal notable advances in current methods relative to older, well-cited tools in the field. While meta-predictors tend to outperform their constituent individual predictors, several newer individual predictors perform comparably to commonly used meta-predictors. Predictor performance varies between high-specificity and high-sensitivity regimes, highlighting that different methods may be optimal for different use cases. We also characterize two potential sources of bias. Predictors that incorporate allele frequency as a predictive feature tend to have reduced performance when distinguishing pathogenic variants from very rare benign variants, and predictors trained on pathogenicity labels from curated variant databases often inherit gene-level label imbalances. Our findings help illuminate the clinical and research utility of modern missense variant effect predictors and identify potential areas for future development.
Keywords:
DROSOPHILA-MELANOGASTER
PROTEIN FUNCTION
PATHOGENICITY
MUTATIONS
IMPACT
DELETERIOUSNESS
RECOMMENDATION
ANNOTATIONS
ELEMENTS
PROGRAM
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

Human Genetics cover
Human Genetics
IF:
3.6
Papers:
4.6K
Citations:
8.9K

Organization

State University System of Florida cover
State University System of Florida
Scholars:
12.6W
Papers: 10.8W
Citations: 130
U
University of California Berkeley
Scholars:
3.5W
Papers: 2.8W
Citations: 11.3W
U
university of south florida
Scholars:
1.5W
Papers: 1.2W
Citations: 9
K
KU Leuven
Scholars:
5.7W
Papers: 5.2W
Citations: 8.1W
University of California System cover
University of California System
Scholars:
37.2W
Papers: 33.6W
Citations: 6.6K
U
universite libre de bruxelles
Scholars:
1.9W
Papers: 1.6W
Citations: 27
V
Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Scholars:
1.4W
Papers: 1.3W
Citations: 129
U
universites de strasbourg etablissements associes
Scholars:
2.4W
Papers: 1.8W
Citations: 19
U
University of Bologna
Scholars:
4.5W
Papers: 3.8W
Citations: 4.1W
researcher View more organizations