arrow
Return

Density-dependent cooperative non-specific binding in solid-phase SELEX affinity selection

delete2013-05-21
delete28
delete
OA
AI
A
Abdullah Ozer
B
Brian S. White
J
John T. Lis
D
David Shalloway *
DOI:10.1093/nar/gkt477delete
deleteOriginal
deleteShare
deleteSave
View PDF
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
The non-specific binding of undesired ligands to a target is the primary factor limiting the enrichment of tight-binding ligands in affinity selection. Solution-phase non-specific affinity is determined by the free-energy of ligand binding to a single target. However, the solid-phase affinity might be higher if a ligand bound concurrently to multiple adjacent immobilized targets in a cooperative manner. Cooperativity could emerge in this case as a simple consequence of the relationship between the free energy of binding, localization entropy and the spatial distribution of the immobilized targets. We tested this hypothesis using a SELEX experimental design and found that non-specific RNA aptamer ligands can concurrently bind up to four bead-immobilized peptide targets, and that this can increase their effective binding affinity by two orders-of-magnitude. Binding curves were quantitatively explained by a new statistical mechanical model of density-dependent cooperative binding, which relates cooperative binding to both the target concentration and the target surface density on the immobilizing substrate. Target immobilization plays a key role in SELEX and other ligand enrichment methods, particularly in new multiplexed microfluidic purification devices, and these results have strong implications for optimizing their performance.
Keywords:
MATHEMATICAL-ANALYSIS
RNA APTAMERS
LIGANDS
PROTEIN
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

Nucleic Acids Research cover
Nucleic Acids Research
IF:
13.1
Papers:
3.6W
Citations:
29.0W

Organization

C
Cornell University
Scholars:
6.3W
Papers: 5.4W
Citations: 10.9W