arrow
Return

Identifying Artifacts from Large Library Docking

delete2024-09-10
delete2
PRE
AI
Y
Yujin Wu
F
Fangyu Liu
I
Isabella Glenn
K
Karla Fonseca-Valencia
L
Lu Paris
Y
Yuyue Xiong
S
Steven V. Jerome
C
Charles L. Brooks
B
Brian K. Shoichet *
DOI:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.4c01632delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
While large library docking has discovered potent ligands for multiple targets, as the libraries have grown the hit lists can become dominated by rare artifacts that cheat our scoring functions. Here, we investigate rescoring top-ranked docked molecules with orthogonal methods to identify these artifacts, exploring implicit solvent models and absolute binding free energy perturbation as cross-filters. In retrospective studies, this approach deprioritized high-ranking nonbinders for nine targets while leaving true ligands relatively unaffected. We tested the method prospectively against hits from docking against AmpC beta-lactamase. We prioritized 128 high-ranking molecules for synthesis and testing, a mixture of 39 molecules flagged as likely cheaters and 89 that were plausible inhibitors. None of the predicted cheating compounds inhibited AmpC detectably, while 57% of the 89 plausible compounds did so. As our libraries continue to grow, deprioritizing docking artifacts by rescoring with orthogonal methods may find wide use.
Keywords:
GENERAL FORCE-FIELD
HIGH-THROUGHPUT
BINDING
CHARMM
DISCOVERY
IDENTIFICATION
AUTOMATION
MOLECULES

Journal

Journal of Medicinal Chemistry cover
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
IF:
6.8
Papers:
2.7W
Citations:
9.4W

Organization

U
university of california san francisco
Scholars:
5.2W
Papers: 4.0W
Citations: 67
S
schrodinger, inc.
Scholars:
629
Papers: 287
Citations: 3
University of California System cover
University of California System
Scholars:
37.5W
Papers: 33.7W
Citations: 6.6K
researcher View more organizations