.png){kind=icon}
Return
Impossible Hypotheses and Effect-Size Limits
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1177/25152459231197605.png)
.png){kind=icon}
Original request for help.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
Psychological science is moving toward further specification of effect sizes when formulating hypotheses, performing power analyses, and considering the relevance of findings. This development has sparked an appreciation for the wider context in which such effect sizes are found because the importance assigned to specific sizes may vary from situation to situation. We add to this development a crucial but in psychology hitherto underappreciated contingency: There are mathematical limits to the magnitudes that population effect sizes can take within the common multivariate context in which psychology is situated, and these limits can be far more restrictive than typically assumed. The implication is that some hypothesized or preregistered effect sizes may be impossible. At the same time, these restrictions offer a way of statistically triangulating the plausible range of unknown effect sizes. We explain the reason for the existence of these limits, illustrate how to identify them, and offer recommendations and tools for improving hypothesized effect sizes by exploiting the broader multivariate context in which they occur.
Keywords:
hypothesis
multivariate statistics
effect size
correlation
sampling
Journal
A
IF:
13.4
Papers:
320
Citations:
3.7K
Organization
Cited Papers
.png){kind=icon}
ShareSaveShareSaveShareSaveShareSaveShareSaveShareSave
View more