张金凤 (Jinfeng Zhang)

chongqing university教授

H指数:15

被引数:559

个人简介

"张金凤，行政管理系主任，主要研究方向为行为公共管理、公共人力资源管理、社会治理等，研究成果发表在Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory、Public Administration、Public Management Review、Journal of Public Policy、International Public Management Journal、Public Performance & Management Review、《中国行政管理》、《行政论坛》等国内外高水平期刊。\n研究生招生\n科研是一场需要同路人的旅程，很高兴你能在此驻足。我深知你们对学术探索的热忱与迷茫。学术之路并非一帆风顺，请相信，在我的课题组里，我永远和你并肩而行：我会耐心倾听你的困惑，尊重你的每一个想法，无论是实验设计、数据分析，还是论文构思，我都会以定期组会、一对一指导的方式，与你共同拆解研究难题，手把手帮/教你写/改论文！！！\n课题组目前围绕合作生产、公务员行为、决策心理、算法决策等行为公共管理前沿方向展开研究，每年招生硕士研究生2-3名、博士生1-2名，热忱欢迎有学术深造意向或跨学科背景的同学加入。\n博士：我会全力支持你参加国内外学术会议和国外顶尖高校访学/联合培养，与优秀的学者交流/合作发表论文,提高国际化水平。博士培养需要倾注更多精力和智慧，本人承诺在博士阶段全程把握、详细指导你的毕业论文，并带领你发表2-3篇顶刊论文，提高你在学术市场的竞争力！！！\n硕士：我会全力支持你参加国内外学术会议，与优秀的学者交流；争取国外高校短期交流的机会，拓宽视野。不管你是工作导向还是读博导向，我都会竭尽全力地帮助你成长，助力你顺利完成学业！！！如果你要继续读博，本人承诺在硕士阶段带领你发表1-2篇顶刊论文，助力你去到更好的地方深造！！！（我对之前毕业的学生全部都做到了）\n如果你有意加入课题组，欢迎将简历与相关材料发送至邮箱，我会及时与你联系与沟通。也欢迎提前关注微信公众号“行为公共管理 Lab”，提前了解我们的研究日常。\n开设课程：《行为实验设计》、《行为公共管理与政策》、《社会研究方法》\n教学成果/奖励\n重庆市一流本科生课程《基层干部危机领导力提升虚拟仿真实验》课程负责人\n重庆大学2023年青年教师教学基本功比赛二等奖、教案设计奖\n代表性科研成果\n科研项目\n2024.12-2027.12, 国家社科基金后期资助项目，24FGLB054，信息架构对公众合作生产行为的作用机理及助推策略研究，主持；\n2024.10-2026.12，教育部人文社科项目，24YJC630292，基层干部为与不为的决策心理及行为改变策略研究，主持；\n2018.01-2020.12，国家自然科学基金（青年基金项目），71704017，“村改居”老年人社区认同对生活质量的影响机制和干预研究，主持；\n2022.11-2024.06, 重庆市社科基金项目，2022NDYB90，城市社区居家养老服务的多主体合作生产机制及政策支持研究，主持；\n2017.11-2019.09, 重庆市社科基金项目，2017YBSH051，基于社区认同提高城市老年人生活质量的干预研究，主持；\n2023.06-2024.06, 重庆市技术预见项目，CSTB2023TFII-DIX0058，重庆市社区智慧养老服务合作生产机制与政策支持研究，主持；\n研究成果:*为通讯作者，#为本人所指导的学生\n公共管理方向（行为公共管理、行政管理、公共政策）\n[1]Zhang J.*, Song M.#, Qin Z., Xu R.#, Ran R. (2026). Are public officials more risk-averse than private sector employees in decision-making? Interest and accountability matter.Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2026(00): 1-16.\n[2]Wang Y.#, Zhang S.,Zhang J.*(2026).The impact of descriptive social norms on coproduction: How communication frames matter.Public Management Review,28(3): 678-704.\n[3]Jia Y.#, Li H., Lyu S.,Zhang J.*(2026). Citizen coproduction motivations: a systematic review and the SPIENM framework.Public Management Review, 2026(00): 1-38.\n[4]Zhang J.,Wen X.#, Mao H.#, Xu R.#, Zhang S.*(2025).Does public officials’ risk preference differ in self versus public decision-making? It depends on decision framing and bet size.Public Administration, 103: 510-535.\n[5]Qiu X.#,Zhang J., Yi C.*(2025). Can information frames nudge citizens to co-produce in emergency preparedness? —evidence from a survey experiment.Public Management Review, onlinefirst publication.\n[6]Zhang, F.*#, Liu, B., &Zhang, J.*(2025). The role of ICT tool interactivity on citizen e-participation in public service provision: a survey experiment based on self-determination theory.Journal of Chinese Governance,onlinefirst publication.\n[7]Liu B., Jia Y.#,Zhang J.*(2025). How institutional pressures influence the blame avoidance behavior of civil servants in China.Public Performance & Management Review,48(4): 820-849.\n[8]Zhang J., Wen X.#, Zhou M.* (2025). Actor, partner, and similarity effects of personality on knowledge sharing: does gender make a difference?Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 23(1), 63-76.\n[9]Wang Y.#,Zhang J.*(2024). Promoting Citizens' willingness to participate in coproduction in public service through information frames.Public Administration, 102, 479-499.\n[10]Liu B., Lin S.#, He S.#,Zhang J.*(2024). Encourage or impede? The relationship between trust in government and coproduction.Public Management Review, 26 (12), 3501-3528.\n[11]Liu B., Lin S.#, Yuan X., He S.#,Zhang J.*(2024). Nudge citizen participation by framing mobilization information: a survey experiment in China.Journal of Chinese Governance, 9(1), 78-103.\n[12]Jia Y.#, Liu B.,Zhang J.*(2024). Impact of supply–demand matching on citizen satisfaction: Analysis based on expectancy disconfirmation model.Journal of Chinese Governance, 9(2), 221-243.\n[13]Liu B., He S.#, Yu W., Chen Y., Hu X.,Zhang J.*(2024). Can transparency promote citizen compliance in China? The role of justice and social identification.International Public Management Journal, 27 (5), 788-808.\n[14]Zhang J., Qin Z.#, Cen J.#, Liu B.* (2024). Restoring the Truth: Anchoring Effects and Debiasing Interventions on Citizen Satisfaction.Public Performance & Management Review, 47 (3), 681-708.\n[15]Liu B., He S.#, Lin S.#,Zhang J.*, Xue B. (2023). How usability of policy transparency promotes citizen compliance: evidence from a survey experiment.Journal of Chinese Governance, 8(4), 473-497.\n[16]Liu B., Qin Z.#,Zhang J.*(2023). The effect of psychological bias on public officials’ attitudes towards the implementation of policy instruments: evidence from survey experiments.Journal of Public Policy, 43(2), 261-283.\n[17]Liu B., Qin Z.#,Zhang J.*(2022). Cognitive bias in citizens’ perceptions of government performance in response to COVID-19: Evidence from a large-scale survey experiment in China.International Public Management Journal, 25(7), 1072-1093\n[18]Liu B., Lin S.#, Wang Q., Chen Y.,Zhang J.* (2021). Can local governments’ disclosure of pandemic information decrease residents’ panic when facing COVID-19 in China?International Public Management Journal, 24(2), 203-221.\n[19]张书维, 张晓会,张金凤*(2023).公共服务动机的曲线效应: 个体-组织匹配的调节作用.中国行政管理, (9), 36-46.\n[20]张金凤.(2024).“为”与“不为”：多重利益情境下基层公务员的决策心理机制——一种行为公共管理的视角.行政论坛, (05), 63-71.\n[21]张金凤,吴嘉蕙#,陈培峰*(2025). 基于政策工具助推公众合作生产行为的实验研究——一项系统文献综述.行为公共管理与政策, 2 (1), 27-63.\n社会保障、社会学与社会工作、心理学方向\n[1]Zhang J.*, Li D#. (2023). Dyadic effects of work overcommitment on depression in dual-earner couples: based on the actor–partner interdependence model.Psychology, Health & Medicine, 28(9), 2430-2440.\n[2]Zhang J*, Wang B. (2022). Rural place attachment and urban community integration of Chinese older adults in rural-to-urban relocation.Ageing & Society,42(6), 1299-1317.\n[3]Zhang J.*, Wang Y.#, Li R.#, Li C. (2022): Depressive ruminationand life satisfaction among institution-dwelling Chinese older adults: The roles of perceivedburdensomeness and social support from individuals within the "