arrow
返回

Activating prior knowledge using multiple-choice question distractors

delete2020-04-28
delete3
PRE
AI
L
Liza C. Schimmelfing
A
Adam M. Persky *
DOI:10.1111/medu.14162delete
delete原文链接
delete原文求助
delete分享
delete收藏
摘要

摘要

En 中文
Context A student's academic success in graduate and professional school may depend on prior knowledge. However, these students may not see important and necessary material for extended periods of time between their pre-requisites and their new course work. As such, they are more prone to being unable to access available information from memory when needed. This study investigated the use of multiple-choice (MC) question examinations in stabilising or reactivating these students' memories for material that is available in their memories, but currently inaccessible due to disuse. Methods A total of 156 incoming first-year student-pharmacists were recruited. These student-pharmacists completed a baseline examination on physiology prior to coursework. This assessment contained fill-in-the-blank (FIB) questions followed by MC versions of the FIB questions. In the experimental sets, 10 questions had MC distractor answers that were answers to a future FIB question; in the other condition, the MC distractors were not answers to future FIB questions. The primary outcome was performance on future or target FIB questions in the context of whether the prior or priming MC questions contained the answer within the distractors. Results Performance on target FIB questions improved when the distractors in the MC questions contained the relevant answer (29%) compared to when the distractors did not contain the correct answer (18%) (P < .001, d = 0.78). When students could not generate a correct response to the FIB question, the experimental condition outperforming the control condition (17% vs 30%, d = 0.76). Conclusions Multiple-choice questions that contained a correct response as a distractor to a future question, improved student performance. As such, the use of MC may be an inexpensive way to reactivate prior knowledge, especially knowledge that has become inaccessible due to disuse.
Keyword:
testing
multiple-choice question
marginal knowledge
AI总结

AI总结

对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。

期刊

Medical Education 封面图
Medical Education
IF:
5.2
论文数:
8.3K
被引数:
1.3W

机构

U
university of north carolina
学者数:
7.4W
论文数: 6.5W
被引数: 93
引用论文

引用论文

The cell biology of thrombospondin-1
err2000-12-01
err0
PREAI
errHui Chen; Mary E. Herndon; Jack Lawler
err分享
err收藏
Residues at the Cytoplasmic End of Transmembrane Helix 2 Determine the Signal Output of the TarEc Chemoreceptor
err2013-04-12
err0
PREAI
errChristopher A. Adase; Roger R. Draheim; Garrett Rueda; Raj Desai; Michael D. Manson
err分享
err收藏
Repeated testing improves long-term retention relative to repeated study: a randomised controlled trial
err2009-12-01
err291
PREAI
errLarsen, Douglas P.; Butler, Andrew C.; Roediger, Henry L., III
err分享
err收藏
err分享
err收藏
err
IF0
err
err0
PREAI
err
err分享
err收藏
MRI features of pediatric atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumors and medulloblastomas of the posterior fossa
err2023-03-14
err0
errOAAI
errHsin‐Wei Wu; Chia‐Hung Wu; Shih‐Chieh Lin; Chih‐Chun Wu; Hsin‐Hung Chen; Yi‐Wei Chen; Yi‐Yen Lee; Feng‐Chi Chang
err分享
err收藏
err
IF0
err
err0
errOAAI
err
err分享
err收藏
学者 查看更多内容