.png){kind=icon}
返回
Can a computer outfake a human?
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1016/j.paid.2023.112434.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Faking on personality tests continues to be a challenge in hiring practices, and with the increased accessibility to free, generative AI large language models (LLM), the difference between human and algorithmic responses is difficult to distinguish. Four LLMs-GPT-3.5, Jasper, Google Bard, and GPT-4 were prompted to provide ideal responses to personality measures, specific to a provided job description. Responses collected from the LLM's were compared to a previously collected student population sample who were also directed to respond in a ideal fashion to the same job description. Overall, score comparisons indicate the superior performance of GPT-4 on both the single stimulus and forced-choice personality assessments and reinforce the need to consider more advanced options in preventing faking on personality assessments. Additionally, results from this study indicate the need for future research, especially as generative AI improves and becomes more accessible to a range of candidates.
Keyword:
Personality
Single stimulus
Forced choice
Generative AI
Large language models
期刊
IF:
2.6
论文数:
1.5W
被引数:
3.6W
机构
引用论文
.png){kind=icon}
Algorithmic inclusion: Shaping the predictive algorithms of artificial intelligence in hiring算法包含: 在招聘中塑造人工智能的预测算法
OAAI
OAAI分享收藏Human resource management in the age of generative artificial intelligence: Perspectives and research directions on ChatGPT生成式人工智能时代的人力资源管理: ChatGPT的视角与研究方向OAAI
OAAI分享收藏Fatigue properties of a low alloy 42SiCr steel heat treated by quenching and partitioning process
OAAI
OAAI分享收藏 没有更多内容
没有更多内容