返回
Coding Practices and Iterativity: Beyond Templates for Analyzing Qualitative Data
DOI:10.1177/1094428120948600.png)
摘要
En 中文
Researchers can expect to perform analytic actions repeatedly; that this iteration is required is a common observation. Yet, how researchers engage in iteration to progress their theorizing is not articulated. Our analysis provides new insight into what it means to iterate in the service of driving analysis. We examine iteration through the lens of the analytic process of coding in specific research projects. Using a relational definition of coding, we identify the reported coding actions of several studies with rich descriptions of their analytical processes. By doing this, we show that it is useful to understand these coding actions in the context of coding moments that relate to how researchers use the coding actions as their project develops. The moments we identify aremaking codes,organizing to code, andputting patterns together. To show iteration, we trace the reported coding practices in exemplar articles. These tracings indicate that the reported process is not a fixed or consistent sequence. Rather, iterativity is organized by what is the next needed analytic input required to progress a given situated study.
Keyword:
case studies
qualitative research
grounded theory
qualitative
research
field research methods
research design
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
7.6
论文数:
885
被引数:
1.4W
机构
引用论文
SANCTIONING IN THE WILD: RATIONAL CALCULUS AND RETRIBUTIVE INSTINCTS IN GOURMET CUISINE野外制裁: 美食中的理性演算和报应本能
From Rational Myth to Self-Fulfilling Prophecy? Understanding the Persistence of Means-ends Decoupling as a Consequence of the Latent Functions of Policy Enactment
ORGANIZATION STUDIES
IF5.2

