arrow
返回

Constructing Scientific Arguments Using Evidence from Dynamic Computational Climate Models

delete2014-06-11
delete43
PRE
AI
A
Amy Pallant *
H
Hee‐Sun Lee
DOI:10.1007/s10956-014-9499-3delete
delete原文链接
delete原文求助
delete分享
delete收藏
摘要

摘要

En 中文
Modeling and argumentation are two important scientific practices students need to develop throughout school years. In this paper, we investigated how middle and high school students (N = 512) construct a scientific argument based on evidence from computational models with which they simulated climate change. We designed scientific argumentation tasks with three increasingly complex dynamic climate models. Each scientific argumentation task consisted of four parts: multiple-choice claim, openended explanation, five-point Likert scale uncertainty rating, and open-ended uncertainty rationale. We coded 1,294 scientific arguments in terms of a claim's consistency with current scientific consensus, whether explanations were model based or knowledge based and categorized the sources of uncertainty (personal vs. scientific). We used chi-square and ANOVA tests to identify significant patterns. Results indicate that (1) a majority of students incorporated models as evidence to support their claims, (2) most students used model output results shown on graphs to confirm their claim rather than to explain simulated molecular processes, (3) students' dependence on model results and their uncertainty rating diminished as the dynamic climate models became more and more complex, (4) some students' misconceptions interfered with observing and interpreting model results or simulated processes, and (5) students' uncertainty sources reflected more frequently on their assessment of personal knowledge or abilities related to the tasks than on their critical examination of scientific evidence resulting from models. These findings have implications for teaching and research related to the integration of scientific argumentation and modeling practices to address complex Earth systems.
Keyword:
Argumentation
Computational modeling, Earth systems, climate change
Online learning
Instructional technology

期刊

Journal of Science Education and Technology 封面图
Journal of Science Education and Technology
IF:
5.5
论文数:
3.4K
被引数:
3.8K

机构

U
university of california santa cruz
学者数:
8.7K
论文数: 6.8K
被引数: 32
University of California System 封面图
University of California System
学者数:
37.5W
论文数: 33.7W
被引数: 6.6K
引用论文

引用论文

The effect of Ga‐doping on the defect chemistry of RE3Al5O12 garnets
err2013-01-22
err0
PREAI
errC. R. Stanek; C. Jiang; S. K. Yadav; K. J. McClellan; B. P. Uberuaga; D. A. Andersson; M. Nikl
err分享
err收藏
err
IF0
err
err0
PREAI
err
err分享
err收藏
Flexible organic light-emitting diodes with transparent carbon nanotube electrodes: problems and solutions
err2010-03-23
err0
PREAI
errLiangbing Hu; Jianfeng Li; Jun Liu; George Grüner; Tobin Marks
err分享
err收藏
Developing a Learning Progression for Scientific Modeling: Making Scientific Modeling Accessible and Meaningful for Learners
err2009-07-07
err864
errOAAI
errSchwarz, Christina V.; Reiser, Brian J.; Davis, Elizabeth A.; Kenyon, Lisa; Acher, Andres; Fortus, David; Shwartz, Yael; Hug, Barbara; Krajcik, Joe
err分享
err收藏
Assessment of Uncertainty- Infused Scientific Argumentation
err2014-03-14
err62
PREAI
errLee, Hee-Sun; Liu, Ou Lydia; Pallant, Amy; Roohr, Katrina Crotts; Pryputniewicz, Sarah; Buck, Zoe E.
err分享
err收藏
学者 查看更多内容