arrow
返回

Developing and evaluating the extended epistemic vigilance framework

delete2024-09-14
delete0
delete
OA
AI
T
Tom Bielik *
M
Moritz Krell
DOI:10.1002/tea.21983delete
delete原文链接
delete分享
delete收藏
查看原文
摘要

摘要

En 中文
In science education, epistemic vigilance plays a key role in the development of students' critical thinking by supporting students' abilities to evaluate the expertise level of the source and to evaluate the claim itself, using rigorous scientific standards and appropriate argumentation heuristics. Based on previous studies, which suggested two aspects of epistemic vigilance-reflecting the source of information and the claim that is made-we developed the Extended Epistemic Vigilance Framework (EEVF) that includes an additional aspect of evaluating the receiver. In an empirical exploratory pilot study, we evaluated the reliability and validity of an EEVF-based category system and investigated to what extent the EEVF can be used to characterize changes in biology graduate students' epistemic vigilance after participating in a critical thinking course. Results show that the EEVF-based category system includes reliable and valid categories for identifying students' epistemic vigilance. A statistically significant increase with a small effect size was found in students' epistemic vigilance regarding the reliability of the source and the references used to support the claim following their participation in the critical thinking course. However, a statistically significant decrease with a small effect size was found regarding the awareness of the aspects of the one-sidedness of the claim, the context of the claim, and cognitive biases and socioemotional influences on the receiver. In general, these findings indicate that the EEVF offers an improved framework to analyze students' epistemic vigilance more comprehensively.
Keyword:
critical thinking
epistemic vigilance
evaluation
AI总结

AI总结

对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。

期刊

Journal of Research in Science Teaching 封面图
Journal of Research in Science Teaching
IF:
4.5
论文数:
2.9K
被引数:
7.8K

机构

L
Leibniz Association
学者数:
3.4W
论文数: 3.1W
被引数: 64
R
Radboud University Nijmegen
学者数:
4.4W
论文数: 3.4W
被引数: 5.4W
引用论文

引用论文

err分享
err收藏
Serum Levels of S100b and NSE Proteins in Patients with Non-Transfusion-Dependent Thalassemia as Biomarkers of Brain Ischemia and Cerebral Vasculopathy
err2017-12-15
err0
errOAAI
errAikaterini Kanavaki; Konstantinos Spengos; Maria Moraki; Polyxeni Delaporta; Catherine Kariyannis; Ioannis Papassotiriou; Antonis Kattamis
err分享
err收藏
err2000-01-01
err0
PREAI
errRoger A. Boothroyd
err分享
err收藏
Imaginal exposure alone and imaginal exposure with cognitive restructuring in treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder.
err2003-08-01
err0
PREAI
errRichard A. Bryant; Michelle L. Moulds; Rachel M. Guthrie; Suzanne T. Dang; Reginald D. V. Nixon
err分享
err收藏
The Public's Bounded Understanding of Science
err2014-06-05
err228
PREAI
errBromme, Rainer; Goldman, Susan R.
err分享
err收藏
Normative social influence is underdetected规范性社会影响被低估
err2008-05-09
err1.3K
errOAAI
errNolan, Jessica M.; Schultz, P. Wesley; Cialdini, Robert B.; Goldstein, Noah J.; Griskevicius, Vladas
err分享
err收藏
学者 查看更多内容