arrow
返回

Does instructor evaluation by students using a web-based questionnaire impact instructor performance?

delete2005-03-01
delete11
PRE
AI
K
Kemal Turhan *
F
Füsun Yarış
E
Eşref Nural
DOI:10.1007/s10459-004-0943-7delete
delete原文链接
delete原文求助
delete分享
delete收藏
摘要

摘要

En 中文
Background: Student feedback is a valuable method to evaluate the quality of education. Using a WEB-based questionnaire, the objective of this study was to evaluate the factors that may affect the ratings given by the students and the impact of those ratings on the instructor's teaching performance. Methods: The questionnaire was organized into four areas: containment, presentation skills, measurement and assessment, and communication skills. In addition, there was a final area in which the students could express their opinions about their instructor. The students were asked to rank their instructors in each of the four areas using a scale of 1-5. In both May 2002 and 2003, the students ranked their instructors using the WEB-based questionnaire. Results: In 2002, 468 students evaluated 146 instructors; while in 2003, 360 students evaluated 144 instructors. Of the total number of instructors evaluated, 140 were evaluated both in 2002 and 2003. The mean point scores for these 140 instructors were 3.64 +/- 0.51 in 2002 and 3.65 +/- 0.54 in 2003. There was no statistically significant difference according to the titles of the instructors. For both 2002 and 2003, regarding the last section in the questionnaire where students could present their opinions, 80 of the students, indicated the instructors had communication problems. All instructors with low scores were mentioned to have poor communication skills. The changes in the mean point scores were evaluated comparing results from 2002 and 2003. Fourteen professors, four associate professors, three assistant professors, two lecturers were found to have higher scores, three professors, seven associate professors, five assistant professors, and one lecturer were found to have lower scores. Conclusion: No significant improvement was found in the mean points of the total group. In the second year, only 16.4 of the instructors were affected positively.
Keyword:
education quality
feedback questionnaire
performance evaluation
students' rating

期刊

Advances in Health Sciences Education 封面图
Advances in Health Sciences Education
IF:
3.3
论文数:
1.8K
被引数:
4.4K

机构

暂无机构信息
引用论文

引用论文

err分享
err收藏
Quality assessment in general practice trainers
err2000-12-01
err7
PREAI
errVernooij-Dassen, MJFJ; Ram, PM; Brenninkmeijer, WJM; Franssen, LJE; Bottema, BJAM; van der Vleuten, CPM; Grol, RPTM
err分享
err收藏
Dicarbavasopressin antagonist analogs exhibit reduced in vivo agonist activity
err2002-05-01
err0
PREAI
errMichael L. Moore; Christine Albrightson; Bridget Brickson; Heidemarie G. Bryan; Nancy Caldwell; James F. Callahan; Jonathan Foster; Lewis B. Kinter; Kenneth A. Newlander
err分享
err收藏
Koyanagi- Snow-Hayashi Urethroplasty in Severe Hypospadias Repair: Between Hope and Reality
err2021-06-01
err0
PREAI
errSmail Acimi; Naima Abderrahmane; Lamia Debbous; Mohammed Ali Acimi; Juba Mansouri
err分享
err收藏
Solid support synthesis of 14- and 17-membered macrocycles via the SNAr methodology
err1999-12-01
err0
PREAI
errAlexander S. Kiselyov; Leon Smith; Paul Tempest
err分享
err收藏
err分享
err收藏
学者 查看更多内容