.png){kind=icon}
返回
Does Self-control Outdo IQ in Predicting Academic Performance?
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1007/s10964-021-01539-4.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Duckworth and Seligman's seminal work found that self-discipline (self-control) was more salient for academic achievement than intelligence. Very little replication work exists, including in different cultures; the current study addressed these gaps. Data were collected from 6(th) and 7(th) grade cohorts of early adolescents (N = 589; age: Mean = 12.34 years, and SD = 0.89; 58% female) over two years. The study tested whether self-control was a stronger predictor than intelligence in explaining academic performance two years later as well as in explaining developmental changes over the course of two years. Path analyses provided evidence that both self-control and intelligence longitudinally predicted teacher-reported academic competence as well as school-reported grades; however, intelligence was a significantly stronger predictor than self-control. In addition, only intelligence predicted developmental changes in each measure of academic performance over time, self-control did not.
Keyword:
Academic achievement
Self-discipline
Intelligence
Schools
Individual differences
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
3.6
论文数:
4.4K
被引数:
1.5W
机构
引用论文
Intrinsic Motivation and Extrinsic Incentives Jointly Predict Performance: A 40-Year Meta-Analysis.png)
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETINIF19.8
PREAI
分享收藏
查看更多内容