返回
Essential guidelines for computational method benchmarking
DOI:10.1186/s13059-019-1738-8.png)
摘要
En 中文
In computational biology and other sciences, researchers are frequently faced with a choice between several computational methods for performing data analyses. Benchmarking studies aim to rigorously compare the performance of different methods using well-characterized benchmark datasets, to determine the strengths of each method or to provide recommendations regarding suitable choices of methods for an analysis. However, benchmarking studies must be carefully designed and implemented to provide accurate, unbiased, and informative results. Here, we summarize key practical guidelines and recommendations for performing high-quality benchmarking analyses, based on our experiences in computational biology.
Keyword:
DIFFERENTIAL EXPRESSION
REPRODUCIBLE RESEARCH
METAANALYSIS METHODS
DATA SETS
RNA
BIOINFORMATICS
METAGENOME
SOFTWARE
SEQUENCE
DESIGN
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
G
IF:
9.4
论文数:
6.4K
被引数:
8.9W
机构
引用论文
The MicroArray Quality Control (MAQC)-IIII study of common practices for the development and validation of microarray-based predictive models微阵列质量控制 (MAQC)-IIII基于微阵列的预测模型的开发和验证的通用实践研究
NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY
IF41.7
Exploring genomic dark matter: A critical assessment of the performance of homology search methods on noncoding RNA
GENOME RESEARCH
IF5.5
Comparison of mapping algorithms used in high-throughput sequencing: application to Ion Torrent data高通量测序中使用的映射算法的比较: 在离子洪流数据中的应用
BMC GENOMICS
IF3.7
Sensitive detection of rare disease-associated cell subsets via representation learning
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
IF15.7

