.png){kind=icon}
返回
Estimating Incremental Validity Under Missing Data
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1080/00273171.2016.1259099.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
A common form of missing data is caused by selection on an observed variable (e.g., Z). If the selection variable was measured and is available, the data are regarded as missing at random (MAR). Selection biases correlation, reliability, and effect size estimates when these estimates are computed on listwise deleted (LD) data sets. On the other hand, maximum likelihood (ML) estimates are generally unbiased and outperform LD in most situations, at least when the data are MAR. The exception is when we estimate the partial correlation. In this situation, LD estimates are unbiased when the cause of missingness is partialled out. In other words, there is no advantage of ML estimates over LD estimates in this situation. We demonstrate that under a MAR condition, even ML estimates may become biased, depending on how partial correlations are computed. Finally, we conclude with recommendations about how future researchers might estimate partial correlations even when the cause of missingness is unknown and, perhaps, unknowable.
Keyword:
Missing data
incremental validity
listwise deletion
maximum likelihood
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
M
IF:
3.5
论文数:
1.8K
被引数:
9.4K
机构
引用论文
On the Bearing Failure of Laminated Composite Pin‐Loaded Joints: Exploitation of Semi‐Analytical Solutions for the Determination of the Stress State.png)
Strain
StrainIF0
PREAI
分享收藏
Implications of direct and indirect range restriction for meta-analysis methods and findings直接和间接范围限制对荟萃分析方法和结果的影响
PREAI
分享收藏
查看更多内容