.png){kind=icon}
返回
Helping Learners Construct Knowledge
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1007/BF01322346.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Cunningham (1992) claimed that semiotics offers a special and valuable perspective for educational psychology and education. He further argued that contemporary educational psychology is neobehaviorist and positivistic and that it has not adequately considered the learner as an active constructor of the signs he/she uses to represent knowledge. This paper challenges Cunningham's view that modern educational psychology has not considered the learner as an active constructor of knowledge. We show that a conception of the learner as active has a long history in educational psychology and that, over the last 30 years, such a view has come to be the dominant force in educational psychology. Further, we demonstrate that Cunningham's description of constructivist alternatives to semiotics are incomplete or distorted. Finally, we show that several contemporary approaches to instruction incorporate and go beyond the contributions of semiotics as described by Cunningham.
Keyword:
semiotics
constructivism
cognitive development
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
8.8
论文数:
1.5K
被引数:
1.3W
机构
引用论文
.png){kind=icon}
The effect of alumina nanofillers size and shape on mechanical behavior of PMMA matrix composite
OAAI
OAAI分享收藏 没有更多内容
没有更多内容