arrow
返回

Modularity, value and exceptions to the mirroring hypothesis

delete2022-11-01
delete2
delete
OA
AI
N
Nicholas Burton *
P
Peter Galvin
DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.07.023delete
delete原文链接
delete分享
delete收藏
查看原文
摘要

摘要

En 中文
The mirroring hypothesis suggests a correspondence between product, firm and industry architecture, however, empirical support to date has been mixed. Drawing upon an inductive study of the UK pensions industry, we break new ground by investigating the extent to which product, firm and industry architectures correspond in the face of changing institutional dynamics - most notably dynamic regulatory change. In considering periods of both correspondence and non-correspondence at the aggregate sector level, our results show that firms in the sector seek the efficiency benefits of product component-level mirroring, but only to the extent that the component has low value. In contrast, where components provided an opportunity to capture value, managers strategically chose non-correspondence by developing stronger relational ties with suppliers and, in a later period, through vertical (re)integration, despite the systemic modularity of the product.
Keyword:
Mirroring hypothesis
Modularity
product architecture
pensions
Regulation
Technology
AI总结

AI总结

对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。

期刊

Journal of Business Research 封面图
Journal of Business Research
IF:
9.8
论文数:
1.0W
被引数:
8.7W

机构

E
Edith Cowan University
学者数:
4.6K
论文数: 5.1K
被引数: 9.2K
N
Northumbria University
学者数:
5.6K
论文数: 6.8K
被引数: 9.5K
引用论文

引用论文

err分享
err收藏
学者 查看更多内容