arrow
返回

Simultaneous decisions at study: time allocation, ordering, and spacing

delete2009-08-28
delete35
PRE
AI
L
Lisa K. Son *
N
Nate Kornell
DOI:10.1007/s11409-009-9049-1delete
delete原文链接
delete原文求助
delete分享
delete收藏
摘要

摘要

En 中文
Learners of all ages face complex decisions about how to study effectively. Here we investigated three such decisions made in concert-time allocation, ordering, and spacing. First, college students were presented with, and made judgments of learning about, 16 word-synonym pairs. Then, when presented with all 16 pairs, they created their own study schedule by choosing when and how long to study each item. The results indicated that (a) the most study time was allocated to difficult items, (b) relatively easy items tended to be studied first, and (c) participants spaced their study at a rate significantly greater than chance. The spacing data, which are of particular interest, differ from previous findings that have suggested that people, including adults, believe massing is more effective than spacing.
Keyword:
Spacing
Metacognition
Studying
Learning
Flashcards
AI总结

AI总结

对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。

期刊

Metacognition and Learning 封面图
Metacognition and Learning
IF:
4.8
论文数:
479
被引数:
2.1K

机构

C
Columbia University
学者数:
7.1W
论文数: 6.4W
被引数: 263
Barnard College 封面图
Barnard College
学者数:
463
论文数: 341
被引数: 832
引用论文

引用论文

The promise and perils of self-regulated study
err2007-04-01
err431
errOAAI
errKornell, Nate; Bjork, Roberr A.
err分享
err收藏
err分享
err收藏
err分享
err收藏
学者 查看更多内容