.png){kind=icon}
返回
Using cognitive models to develop quality multiple-choice questions
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.3109/0142159X.2016.1150989.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
With the recent interest in competency-based education, educators are being challenged to develop more assessment opportunities. As such, there is increased demand for exam content development, which can be a very labor-intense process. An innovative solution to this challenge has been the use of automatic item generation (AIG) to develop multiple-choice questions (MCQs). In AIG, computer technology is used to generate test items from cognitive models (i.e. representations of the knowledge and skills that are required to solve a problem). The main advantage yielded by AIG is the efficiency in generating items. Although technology for AIG relies on a linear programming approach, the same principles can also be used to improve traditional committee-based processes used in the development of MCQs. Using this approach, content experts deconstruct their clinical reasoning process to develop a cognitive model which, in turn, is used to create MCQs. This approach is appealing because it: (1) is efficient; (2) has been shown to produce items with psychometric properties comparable to those generated using a traditional approach; and (3) can be used to assess higher order skills (i.e. application of knowledge). The purpose of this article is to provide a novel framework for the development of high-quality MCQs using cognitive models.
Keyword:
AUTOMATIC ITEM GENERATION
DISTRACTORS
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
M
IF:
4.4
论文数:
6.6K
被引数:
1.4W
机构
引用论文
分享收藏Estimating the Entropy of a Weibull Distribution under Generalized Progressive Hybrid Censoring.png)
Entropy
OAAI
EntropyIF0
OAAI分享收藏Different written assessment methods: what can be said about their strengths and weaknesses?不同的书面评估方法: 关于他们的优点和缺点可以说些什么？MEDICAL EDUCATION
MEDICAL EDUCATIONIF5.2
PREAI
分享收藏Impact of item-writing flaws in multiple-choice questions on student achievement in high-stakes nursing assessments多项选择题中项目写作缺陷对高风险护理评估学生成绩的影响MEDICAL EDUCATION
MEDICAL EDUCATIONIF5.2
PREAI
分享收藏分享收藏
查看更多内容