.png){kind=icon}
返回
Why animals can outrun robots
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1126/scirobotics.adi9754.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Animals are much better at running than robots. The difference in performance arises in the important dimensions of agility, range, and robustness. To understand the underlying causes for this performance gap, we compare natural and artificial technologies in the five subsystems critical for running: power, frame, actuation, sensing, and control. With few exceptions, engineering technologies meet or exceed the performance of their biological counterparts. We conclude that biology's advantage over engineering arises from better integration of subsystems, and we identify four fundamental obstacles that roboticists must overcome. Toward this goal, we highlight promising research directions that have outsized potential to help future running robots achieve animal-level performance.
Keyword:
ELASTIC ENERGY-STORAGE
LEGGED LOCOMOTION
POWER OUTPUT
MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES
GENERATING CAPACITY
NEURAL-NETWORKS
METABOLIC-RATE
MOTOR CONTROL
MOMENT ARM
DESIGN
期刊
IF:
27.5
论文数:
937
被引数:
1.4W
机构
引用论文
The Effects of Read‐Aloud Accommodations for Students With and Without Disabilities: A Meta‐Analysis
.png){kind=icon}
PREAI
分享收藏分享收藏分享收藏
分享收藏Comparison of utilization, cost, adherence, and hypoglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes initiating rapid-acting insulin analog with prefilled pen versus vial/syringe2型糖尿病患者使用预填充笔与小瓶/注射器开始使用速效胰岛素类似物的利用率，成本，依从性和低血糖的比较
OAAI
OAAI分享收藏
查看更多内容