.png){kind=icon}
Return
Performance evaluation in work settings
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.141.png)
.png){kind=icon}
Original request for help.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
Recent research from 1993 on performance evaluations in work settings is reviewed and integrated with the prior reset and historical bases. Contemporary research reflects several themes: General models; of job performance are being developed, the job performance domain is being expanded, research continues to explore the psychometric characteristics of performance ratings, research is developing on potential bias in ratings, rater training is examined, and research continues in terms of efforts to attach utility values to rated performance. We conclude that research is progressing in traditional content areas as well in the exploration of new ground. Researchers are recognizing that job performance is more than just the execution of specific tasks and that it involves a wider array of important organizational activities. There is also an increased optimism regarding the use of supervisory ratings and recognition that such subjective appraisal instruments do not automatically translate into rater error or bias.
Keywords:
performance
appraisal
evaluation
utility
review
AI Summary
Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.
Journal
IF:
29.4
Papers:
1.9K
Citations:
3.0W
Organization
No organization information available
Cited Papers
ShareSave
Preparation and characterization of monoclonal antibody specific for Naja nivea cardiotoxin VII1.png)
Toxicon
ToxiconIF0
PREAI
ShareSaveShareSaveShareSaveShareSave
View more