.png){kind=icon}
Return
Personnel selection
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093716.png)
.png){kind=icon}
Original request for help.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
We review developments in personnel selection since the previous review by Hough & Oswald (2000) in the Annual Review of Psycholog. We organize the review around a taxonomic structure of possible bases for improved selection, which includes (a) better understanding of the criterion domain and criterion measurement, (b) improved measurement of existing predictor methods or constructs, (c) identification and measurement of new predictor methods or constructs, (d) improved identification of features that moderate or mediate predictor-criterion relationships, (e) clearer understanding of the relationship between predictors or between predictors and criteria (e.g., via meta-analytic synthesis), (f) identification and prediction of new outcome variables, (g) improved ability to determine how well we predict the outcomes of interest, (b) improved understanding of subgroup differences, fairness, bias, and the legal defensibility, (i) improved administrative ease with which selection systems can be used, (j) improved insight into applicant reactions, and (k) improved decision-maker acceptance of selection systems.
Keywords:
job performance
testing
validity
adverse impact
ability
personality
Journal
IF:
29.4
Papers:
1.9K
Citations:
3.0W
Organization
Cited Papers
ShareSaveShareSaveShareSaveAbnormal intracellular calcium handling in myocardium from patients with end-stage heart failure.
OAAI
OAAIShareSaveShareSaveA meta-analysis of work sample test validity: Updating and integrating some classic literature.png)
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGYIF6.4
PREAI
ShareSave
View more