arrow
Return

A comprehensive comparison on cell-type composition inference for spatial transcriptomics data

delete2022-06-27
delete33
delete
OA
AI
J
Jiawen Chen
W
Weifang Liu
T
Tianyou Luo
Z
Zhentao Yu
M
Min-Zhi Jiang
J
Jia Wen
G
Gaorav P. Gupta
P
Paola Giusti
H
Hongtu Zhu
杨宇晨 cover
杨宇晨 (Yuchen Yang)
李越 (Yun Li) *
DOI:10.1093/bib/bbac245delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Spatial transcriptomics (ST) technologies allow researchers to examine transcriptional profiles along with maintained positional information. Such spatially resolved transcriptional characterization of intact tissue samples provides an integrated view of gene expression in its natural spatial and functional context. However, high-throughput sequencing-based ST technologies cannot yet reach single cell resolution. Thus, similar to bulk RNA-seq data, gene expression data at ST spot-level reflect transcriptional profiles of multiple cells and entail the inference of cell-type composition within each ST spot for valid and powerful subsequent analyses. Realizing the critical importance of cell-type decomposition, multiple groups have developed ST deconvolution methods. The aim of this work is to review state-of-the-art methods for ST deconvolution, comparing their strengths and weaknesses. In particular, we construct ST spots from single-cell level ST data to assess the performance of 10 methods, with either ideal reference or non-ideal reference. Furthermore, we examine the performance of these methods on spot- and bead-level ST data by comparing estimated cell-type proportions to carefully matched single-cell ST data. In comparing the performance on various tissues and technological platforms, we concluded that RCTD and stereoscope achieve more robust and accurate inferences.
Keywords:
spatial transcriptomics
single-cell
cell-type deconvolution
deep learning
probabilistic modeling

Journal

Briefings in Bioinformatics cover
Briefings in Bioinformatics
IF:
7.7
Papers:
5.6K
Citations:
2.7W

Organization

U
university of north carolina
Scholars:
7.4W
Papers: 6.5W
Citations: 93
U
University of North Carolina School of Medicine
Scholars:
1.6W
Papers: 1.1W
Citations: 20
U
University of North Carolina Chapel Hill
Scholars:
3.9W
Papers: 3.1W
Citations: 46
researcher View more organizations