arrow
返回

A new perspective for evaluating innovative science programs

delete2003-06-06
delete20
PRE
AI
D
Daniel T. Hickey
S
Steven J. Zuiker
DOI:10.1002/sce.10087delete
delete原文链接
delete原文求助
delete分享
delete收藏
摘要

摘要

En 中文
This paper outlines a stridently sociocultural perspective on educational program evaluation. This perspective emerged across successive attempts to evaluate science programs in a manner consistent with sociocultural views of knowing and learning, while still yielding conventional evidence of achievement. The perspective is characterized by (1) rigorous use of multiple-choice tests, performance assessments, and interpretive event-based analyses, (2) a dialectical approach to reconciling conflicting conclusions from different types of individual assessments, and between individual and event-oriented assessments, and (3) a pragmatic focus on the differences among various implementations of the innovation, with judicious, targeted use of comparison groups. Innovators facing the tension between contemporary views of knowing and learning and conventional views of accountability should find this perspective particularly useful. It is relevant for a broad range of evaluation contexts, including large-scale externally funded innovations as well as more informal practitioner-initiated studies, and should be useful in many content domains. (C) 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Keyword:
SITUATIVITY
AI总结

AI总结

对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。

期刊

Journal of Science Education and Technology 封面图
Journal of Science Education and Technology
IF:
5.5
论文数:
3.4K
被引数:
3.8K

机构

暂无机构信息
引用论文

引用论文

Intrinsic defects, nonstoichiometry, and aliovalent doping of ABO perovskite scintillators
err2014-07-08
err0
PREAI
errL. Casillas‐Trujillo; D. A. Andersson; B. Dorado; M. Nikl; K. E. Sickafus; K. J. McClellan; C. R. Stanek
err分享
err收藏
err分享
err收藏
Orf
err2008-01-14
err0
PREAI
errH. W. Reid; S. M. Rodger
err分享
err收藏
学者 查看更多内容