arrow
返回

Avoiding common pitfalls in mixed methods research?

delete2024-08-26
delete2
delete
OA
AI
P
Patricia O’Sullivan *
A
Ayelet Kuper
J
Jennifer Cleland
DOI:10.1007/s10459-024-10362-ydelete
delete原文链接
delete原文求助
delete分享
delete收藏
摘要

摘要

En 中文
This column is intended to address the kinds of knotty problems and dilemmas with which many scholars grapple in studying health professions education. In this article, the authors focus on how to help mentees take an analytic approach to improve their mixed methods work. Mixed methods research has increased in popularity and with that comes both strengths and weaknesses in these studies. We suggest key elements to look for when reading a mixed methods research paper. We also provide guidance around weaknesses we have noticed in reporting.

期刊

Advances in Health Sciences Education 封面图
Advances in Health Sciences Education
IF:
3.3
论文数:
1.8K
被引数:
4.4K

机构

U
university of california san francisco
学者数:
5.3W
论文数: 4.0W
被引数: 67
University of California System 封面图
University of California System
学者数:
37.7W
论文数: 33.8W
被引数: 6.6K
U
university of toronto
学者数:
14.8W
论文数: 12.0W
被引数: 165
学者 查看更多机构
引用论文

引用论文

What does consumer and community involvement in health-related education look like? A mixed methods study
err2023-11-30
err6
PREAI
errFossey, Ellie; Bonnamy, James; Dart, Janeane; Petrakis, Melissa; Buus, Niels; Soh, Sze-Ee; Diug, Basia; Ayton, Dashini; Brand, Gabrielle
err分享
err收藏
Why Open-Ended Survey Questions Are Unlikely to Support Rigorous Qualitative Insights
err2018-03-01
err388
errOAAI
errLaDonna, Kori A.; Taylor, Taryn; Lingard, Lorelei
err分享
err收藏
没有更多内容