Controversies over integrity testing: Two viewpoints

Deniz S. Öneş

doi:10.1007/BF02251783

Controversies over integrity testing: Two viewpoints

1996-06-01

10

PRE

AI

Chokalingam Viswesvaran

D

David T. Lykken

DOI：10.1007/BF02251783

原文链接

原文求助

摘要

En 中文

In the August 1993 issue of Journal of Applied Psychology, Deniz Ones, Vish Viswesvaran, and Frank Schmidt published a monograph on the validity of integrity tests as revealed by meta-analysis. They concluded that integrity tests have substantial and generalizable predictive validity for criteria of both overall job performance and counterproductive behaviors on the job (e.g., disciplinary problems, absenteeism, rule breaking, violence on the job, theft, etc.). During the Fall of 1992, the authors sent a preprint of this study to David Lykken of the University of Minnesota, stimulating the exchange of letters that is reproduced here. The doubts, concerns, and feelings about integrity tests expressed by Professor Lykken are likely to be shared by others. The responses by Professors Schmidt, Ones, and Viswesvaran attempt to show that these worries are unfounded.

Controversies over integrity testing: Two viewpoints

摘要

期刊

机构

引用论文