返回
How does coaching interviewees affect the validity of a structured interview?
DOI:10.1002/job.512.png)
摘要
En 中文
Coaching interviewees to perform in employment interviews can influence the interview scores. We describe different types of coaching, emphasizing interventions designed to focus interviewees on core, interview-relevant content and to help them convey the content accurately (as opposed to interventions designed to teach interviewees to manipulate their scores using peripheral means). We then study the effects of the former type of intervention in relation to the criterion-related validity of a structured employment interview. In a combined sample of 146 public safety job incumbents, a predictive validation study was conducted using scores from a situational panel interview. Predictive validity and reliability was observed to be higher in a sample of coached interviewees compared to a sample of uncoached interviewees. Implications for future research and practice in organizational behavior are discussed. Copyright (c) 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Keyword:
SITUATIONAL EMPLOYMENT INTERVIEWS
PERCEIVED ORGANIZATIONAL SUPPORT
APPLICANT IMPRESSION MANAGEMENT
SELECTION INTERVIEW
APTITUDE-TESTS
SELF-EFFICACY
PERFORMANCE
TACTICS
METAANALYSIS
CONSTRUCTS
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
6.8
论文数:
2.5K
被引数:
2.0W
机构
引用论文
Poor performance in physical education – a risk factor for bully victimization. A case‐control study体育表现不佳-欺凌受害的危险因素。病例对照研究
Gold nanorods crosslinking PNIPAM hydrogels via dynamic Au-thiolate interaction with stretchable, adhesive, self-healing, and photothermal properties金纳米棒通过动态金硫醇盐相互作用交联PNIPAM水凝胶,具有可拉伸,粘合,自修复和光热性能

