arrow
返回

How does coaching interviewees affect the validity of a structured interview?

delete2007-12-04
delete27
PRE
AI
T
Todd J. Maurer *
J
Jerry M. Solamon
M
Michael Lippstreu
DOI:10.1002/job.512delete
delete原文链接
delete原文求助
delete分享
delete收藏
摘要

摘要

En 中文
Coaching interviewees to perform in employment interviews can influence the interview scores. We describe different types of coaching, emphasizing interventions designed to focus interviewees on core, interview-relevant content and to help them convey the content accurately (as opposed to interventions designed to teach interviewees to manipulate their scores using peripheral means). We then study the effects of the former type of intervention in relation to the criterion-related validity of a structured employment interview. In a combined sample of 146 public safety job incumbents, a predictive validation study was conducted using scores from a situational panel interview. Predictive validity and reliability was observed to be higher in a sample of coached interviewees compared to a sample of uncoached interviewees. Implications for future research and practice in organizational behavior are discussed. Copyright (c) 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Keyword:
SITUATIONAL EMPLOYMENT INTERVIEWS
PERCEIVED ORGANIZATIONAL SUPPORT
APPLICANT IMPRESSION MANAGEMENT
SELECTION INTERVIEW
APTITUDE-TESTS
SELF-EFFICACY
PERFORMANCE
TACTICS
METAANALYSIS
CONSTRUCTS
AI总结

AI总结

对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。

期刊

Journal of Organizational Behavior 封面图
Journal of Organizational Behavior
IF:
6.8
论文数:
2.5K
被引数:
2.0W

机构

U
university system of georgia
学者数:
7.3W
论文数: 6.6W
被引数: 101
G
Georgia State University
学者数:
5.4K
论文数: 4.4K
被引数: 9.6K
引用论文

引用论文

Kagome superconductors
err2022-01-01
err0
errOAAI
errXi-Lin Feng; Kun Jiang; Jiang-Ping Hu
err分享
err收藏
学者 查看更多内容