.png){kind=icon}
返回
How Methodological Features Affect Effect Sizes in Education
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.3102/0013189X16656615.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
As evidence becomes increasingly important in educational policy, it is essential to understand how research design might contribute to reported effect sizes in experiments evaluating educational programs. A total of 645 studies from 12 recent reviews of evaluations of preschool, reading, mathematics, and science programs were studied. Effect sizes were roughly twice as large for published articles, small-scale trials, and experimenter-made measures, compared to unpublished documents, large-scale studies, and independent measures, respectively. Effect sizes were significantly higher in quasi-experiments than in randomized experiments. Excluding tutoring studies, there were no significant differences in effect sizes between elementary and middle/high studies. Regression analyses found that effects of all factors maintained after controlling for all other factors. Explanations for the effects of methodological features on effect sizes are discussed, as are implications for evidence-based policy.
Keyword:
disparities
effect size
program evaluation
research methodology
research utilization
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
4.9
论文数:
1.1K
被引数:
9.0K
机构
引用论文
.png){kind=icon}
分享收藏
分享收藏
The effectiveness of educational technology applications for enhancing mathematics achievement in K-12 classrooms: A meta-analysis教育技术应用对提高K-12课堂数学成绩的有效性: 荟萃分析
PREAI
分享收藏
查看更多内容