.png){kind=icon}
返回
Open Science Is Robust Science
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1017/iop.2017.85.png)
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Grand et al. (2018) provide a critical treatment of the need for industrial and organizational (I-O) psychologists to take active steps to ensure that ours is a robust and reliable science of organizations, the spirit of which the present authors wholeheartedly agree. One path toward ensuring that I-O psychology is rightly recognized as a robust science is by embracing the principles of Open Science. We argue that the move toward Open Science is beneficial for all six of the defining principles outlined by Grand et al. Open Science increases transparency, facilitates replication, and contributes to the accumulation and integration of research by increasing accessibility. Each of these factors helps to foster systematic, rigorous scientific practices, which, in turn, can lead to greater insights and understanding of organizational phenomenon through deductive, inductive, and abductive approaches to theory generation and refinement, ensuring that our field remains relevant for the foreseeable future. In this commentary, we highlight several initiatives that already exist to promote Open Science and explore others only alluded to by Grand et al.
Keyword:
QUESTIONABLE RESEARCH PRACTICES
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
I
IF:
11.5
论文数:
1.5K
被引数:
1.9K
机构
引用论文
.png){kind=icon}
Scientific Utopia: II. Restructuring Incentives and Practices to Promote Truth Over PublishabilityOAAI
OAAI分享收藏
分享收藏
查看更多内容