.png){kind=icon}
返回
Prioritizing Simulation Facilitators' Competencies for Professional Development Using Q-Methodology
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1016/j.ecns.2024.101527.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Background: High -quality simulation requires competent facilitation. The Facilitator Competency Rubric (FCR) identifies facilitator competencies; a gap exists prioritizing competency development. Methods: Using Watts and Stenner's Q -methodology, 73 simulationists prioritized 29 statements derived from FCR from most to least meaningful. We analyzed data using Spearman correlation and centroid factor analysis with varimax rotation and described viewpoint differences using qualitative analysis. Results: Two main viewpoints explained 41.5% of variance. Simulationists across both viewpoints agreed creating psychologically -safe environments was most important whereas administrative tasks were least. The two distinct viewpoints emphasized facilitating metacognition during simulation and debriefing verses structuring debriefing. Implications: This paper provides professional development design recommendations.
Keyword:
Competency
Facilitator
Facilitator competency rubric
Novice
Professional development
Q-methodology
Simulation
Training
期刊
IF:
2.5
论文数:
1.7K
被引数:
3.6K
机构
引用论文
.png){kind=icon}
分享收藏Vulnerability and Poverty Dynamics in Rural Areas of Eastern Cape Province, South Africa南非东开普省农村地区的脆弱性与贫困动态
OAAI
OAAI分享收藏
查看更多内容