.png){kind=icon}
返回
svclassify: a method to establish benchmark structural variant calls
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1186/s12864-016-2366-2.png)
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Background: The human genome contains variants ranging in size from small single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) to large structural variants (SVs). High-quality benchmark small variant calls for the pilot National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Reference Material (NA12878) have been developed by the Genome in a Bottle Consortium, but no similar high-quality benchmark SV calls exist for this genome. Since SV callers output highly discordant results, we developed methods to combine multiple forms of evidence from multiple sequencing technologies to classify candidate SVs into likely true or false positives. Our method (svclassify) calculates annotations from one or more aligned bam files from many high-throughput sequencing technologies, and then builds a one-class model using these annotations to classify candidate SVs as likely true or false positives. Results: We first used pedigree analysis to develop a set of high-confidence breakpoint-resolved large deletions. We then used svclassify to cluster and classify these deletions as well as a set of high-confidence deletions from the 1000 Genomes Project and a set of breakpoint-resolved complex insertions from Spiral Genetics. We find that likely SVs cluster separately from likely non-SVs based on our annotations, and that the SVs cluster into different types of deletions. We then developed a supervised one-class classification method that uses a training set of random non-SV regions to determine whether candidate SVs have abnormal annotations different from most of the genome. To test this classification method, we use our pedigree-based breakpoint-resolved SVs, SVs validated by the 1000 Genomes Project, and assembly-based breakpoint-resolved insertions, along with semi-automated visualization using svviz. Conclusions: We find that candidate SVs with high scores from multiple technologies have high concordance with PCR validation and an orthogonal consensus method MetaSV (99.7 % concordant), and candidate SVs with low scores are questionable. We distribute a set of 2676 high-confidence deletions and 68 high-confidence insertions with high svclassify scores from these call sets for benchmarking SV callers. We expect these methods to be particularly useful for establishing high-confidence SV calls for benchmark samples that have been characterized by multiple technologies.
Keyword:
COPY NUMBER VARIATION
ACCURATE
GENOTYPE
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
3.7
论文数:
1.9W
被引数:
5.2W
机构
引用论文
BreakDancer: an algorithm for high-resolution mapping of genomic structural variationBreakDancer: 基因组结构变异的高分辨率映射算法.png)
NATURE METHODSOAAI
NATURE METHODSIF32.1
OAAI分享收藏分享收藏Detecting and annotating genetic variations using the HugeSeq pipelineNATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY
OAAI
NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGYIF41.7
OAAI分享收藏CNVnator: An approach to discover, genotype, and characterize typical and atypical CNVs from family and population genome sequencingGENOME RESEARCHOAAI
GENOME RESEARCHIF5.5
OAAI分享收藏Analysis of deletion breakpoints from 1,092 humans reveals details of mutation mechanismsNATURE COMMUNICATIONSOAAI
NATURE COMMUNICATIONSIF15.7
OAAI分享收藏Nucleotide-resolution analysis of structural variants using BreakSeq and a breakpoint libraryNATURE BIOTECHNOLOGYOAAI
NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGYIF41.7
OAAI分享收藏
查看更多内容