.png){kind=icon}
返回
Technology and Assessment in Selection
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091317.png)
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
As technology evolves and is incorporated into testing and assessment applications, psychologists have opportunities to improve testing processes making scores on measurement tools more accurate, the administration process more efficient, and often the assessment process more realistic. At the same time, they also must contend with fundamental changes in the assumptions made about good testing practices and confront new problems that are created by technological enhancements. Issues such as distractions and their implications for test performance, changes to the applicant pool and their effect on adverse impact, and cheating and its impact on test scores must be explored. This article provides examples of how technology is being used in tests and assessments, discusses the advantages and disadvantages of relying on technology, and offers an agenda for future research.
Keyword:
test
assessment
selection
technology
computer administration
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
31.1
论文数:
470
被引数:
6.4K
机构
暂无机构信息
引用论文
A meta-analysis of work sample test validity: Updating and integrating some classic literature.png)
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGYIF6.4
PREAI
分享收藏Web-based and paper-and-pencil testing of applicants in a proctored setting: Are personality, biodata, and situational judgment tests comparable?PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGYIF6.4
PREAI
分享收藏Video-based versus written situational judgment tests: A comparison in terms of predictive validityOAAI
OAAI分享收藏分享收藏
查看更多内容