.png){kind=icon}
返回
Twelve tips for data extraction for knowledge syntheses
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1080/0142159X.2025.2551252.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
In medical education, the number of knowledge syntheses has increased dramatically, reflecting their growth and influence on education practice, research, and policy. However, despite the availability of instruction on many of the steps of conducting knowledge syntheses, practical guidance for the critical step of data extraction is limited. Data extraction is the process of systematically identifying and collecting information from the studies included in a knowledge synthesis. Without clear guidance, data extraction can become flawed and overly time-consuming, ultimately jeopardizing the quality of the knowledge synthesis. This article addresses this gap by offering 12 practical tips for data extraction. The tips are grounded in the literature and informed by the authors’ collective experience conducting and mentoring knowledge synthesis projects. Organized into two sections, creating a data extraction tool and operationalizing it, the tips provide actionable guidance on aligning extraction with research objectives, supporting a team-based approach, resolving discrepancies, and how to pilot a data extraction tool. Taken together, these tips aim to improve the rigor, efficiency, and reliability of knowledge synthesis in medical education.
Keyword:
knowledge synthesis
literature reviews
data extraction
期刊
M
IF:
4.4
论文数:
6.6K
被引数:
1.4W
机构
引用论文
PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic ReviewsPrisma-s: 对PRISMA声明的扩展，用于报告系统综述中的文献搜索.png)
SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS
OAAI
SYSTEMATIC REVIEWSIF3.9
OAAI分享收藏Description, justification and clarification: a framework for classifying the purposes of research in medical educationMEDICAL EDUCATIONOAAI
MEDICAL EDUCATIONIF5.2
OAAI分享收藏PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation范围界定审查的PRISMA扩展 (prisma-scr): 清单和解释OAAI
OAAI分享收藏Artificial intelligence in systematic reviews: promising when appropriately used系统评价中的人工智能: 适当使用时很有希望BMJ Open
OAAI
BMJ OpenIF0
OAAI分享收藏Using bibliographic software to appraise and code data in educational systematic review researchMEDICAL TEACHER
MEDICAL TEACHERIF4.4
PREAI
分享收藏The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviewsPRISMA 2020声明: 报告系统评价的最新指南OAAI
OAAI分享收藏
查看更多内容