arrow
Return

Principles and Guidelines for Evaluating Social RobotNavigation Algorithms

delete2025-02-20
delete0
delete
OA
AI
A
Anthony Francis *
C
Claudia Pérez-D’Arpino
C
Chengshu Li
夏飞 (Fei Xia)
A
Alexandre Alahi
R
Rachid Alami
A
Aniket Bera
A
Abhijat Biswas
J
Joydeep Biswas
R
Rohan Chandra
H
Hao-Tien Lewis Chiang
M
Michael Everett
S
Sehoon Ha
J
Justin Hart
J
Jonathan P. How
H
Haresh Karnan
T
Tsang-Wei Edward Lee
L
Luis J. Manso
R
Reuth Mirsky
S
Sören Pirk
P
Phani Teja Singamaneni
P
Peter Stone
A
Ada V. Taylor
P
Peter Trautman
N
Nathan Tsoi
M
Marynel Vázquez
X
Xu, Peng
X
Xiao, Xuesu
N
Naoki Yokoyama
A
Alexander Toshev
R
Roberto Martín-Martín
DOI:10.1145/3700599delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
A major challenge to deploying robots widely is navigation in human-populated environments, commonly referred to as social robot navigation. While the field of social navigation has advanced tremendously in recent years, the fair evaluation of algorithms that tackle social navigation remains hard because it involves not just robotic agents moving in static environments but also dynamic human agents and their perceptions of the appropriateness of robot behavior. In contrast, clear, repeatable, and accessible benchmarks have accelerated progress in fields like computer vision, natural language processing and traditional robot navigation by enabling researchers to fairly compare algorithms, revealing limitations of existing solutions and illuminating promising new directions. We believe the same approach can benefit social navigation. In this article, we pave the road toward common, widely accessible, and repeatable benchmarking criteria to evaluate social robot navigation. Our contributions include (a) a definition of a socially navigating robot as one that respects the principles of safety, comfort, legibility, politeness, social competency, agent understanding, proactivity, and responsiveness to context, (b) guidelines for the use of metrics, development of scenarios, benchmarks, datasets, and simulators to evaluate social navigation, and (c) a design of a social navigation metrics framework to make it easier to compare results from different simulators, robots, and datasets.
Keywords:
social robotics
robot navigation
datasets
benchmarks
simulators

Journal

A
ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction
IF:
5.5
Papers:
55
Citations:
1.3K

Organization

G
Georgia Institute of Technology
Scholars:
1.8W
Papers: 1.4W
Citations: 5.9W
A
alphabet inc.
Scholars:
1.1K
Papers: 663
Citations: 0
C
centre national de la recherche scientifique (cnrs)
Scholars:
24.5W
Papers: 18.2W
Citations: 279
U
university of kiel
Scholars:
2.3W
Papers: 1.8W
Citations: 15
B
Bar Ilan University
Scholars:
9.7K
Papers: 8.5K
Citations: 59
A
Aston University
Scholars:
4.8K
Papers: 5.6K
Citations: 8.8K
T
tufts university
Scholars:
1.7W
Papers: 1.5W
Citations: 24
C
Carnegie Mellon University
Scholars:
1.4W
Papers: 1.4W
Citations: 2.7W
S
Stanford University
Scholars:
9.6W
Papers: 8.2W
Citations: 17.0W
N
nvidia corporation
Scholars:
767
Papers: 439
Citations: 1
Purdue University System cover
Purdue University System
Scholars:
3.9W
Papers: 3.6W
Citations: 66
U
university system of georgia
Scholars:
7.3W
Papers: 6.5W
Citations: 101
U
university of texas austin
Scholars:
2.4W
Papers: 2.0W
Citations: 54
U
University of Virginia
Scholars:
3.0W
Papers: 2.7W
Citations: 4.1W
E
Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne
Scholars:
1.7W
Papers: 1.3W
Citations: 25
U
universite de toulouse
Scholars:
3.5W
Papers: 2.7W
Citations: 37
S
swiss federal institutes of technology domain
Scholars:
9.0W
Papers: 8.0W
Citations: 163
U
university of texas system
Scholars:
18.5W
Papers: 15.6W
Citations: 210
P
Purdue University
Scholars:
2.7W
Papers: 2.1W
Citations: 147
D
deepmind
Scholars:
24
Papers: 11
Citations: 0
G
Google Incorporated
Scholars:
3.5K
Papers: 1.8K
Citations: 8
researcher View more organizations