返回
Meta-analytic relations between thinking styles and intelligence
DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2020.110322.png)
摘要
En 中文
Objective: The current meta-analysis sought to examine the relations of individual differences in intelligence with individual differences in reflective (or rational or analytic) thinking style and intuitive thinking style. Method: Using multiple search strategies, we located 8,425 data sources that we considered for inclusion in the current meta-analysis. The screening of the data sources resulted in 58 independent non-clinical samples with adult participants (N = 15,569). Results: Using Schmidt and Hunter's (2015) meta-analytic procedures, we found a significant positive meta-analytic relation between reflective thinking style and intelligence (rho = 0.274, 95% CI = 0.114 to 0.340) and a nonsignificant negative relation between intuitive thinking style and intelligence (rho = -0.095; 95% CI = -0.203 to 0.013). In addition to the main effects, we reported the results of publication bias tests and moderator analyses. Conclusion: We discussed the results in terms of their contribution and future research directions. Given our results, an important future research direction involves examining the additive (i.e., incremental) and interactive effects of thinking styles and intelligence on important decision-making outcomes (e.g., job performance, health behavior).
Keyword:
Reflective thinking style
Rational thinking style
Analytical thinking style
Intuitive thinking style
Intelligence
Dual-process theories
Meta-analysis
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
2.6
论文数:
1.5W
被引数:
3.6W
机构
引用论文
Reasoning independently of prior belief and individual differences in actively open-minded thinking独立于先前信念和积极开放思维的个体差异的推理
A meta-analysis of the relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and counterproductive work behavior组织公民行为与反生产行为关系的元分析

