.png){kind=icon}
返回
Professional Development Research: Consensus, Crossroads, and Challenges
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.3102/0013189X13512674.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Commentaries regarding appropriate methods for researching professional development have been a frequent topic in recent issues of Educational Researcher as well as other venues. In this article, the authors extend this discussion by observing that randomized trials of specific professional development programs have not enhanced our knowledge of effective program characteristics, leaving practitioners without guidance with regard to best practices. In response, the authors propose that scholars should execute more rigorous comparisons of professional development designs at the initial stages of program development and use information derived from these studies to build a professional knowledge base. The authors illustrate with examples of both a proposed study and reviews of evidence on key questions in the literature.
Keyword:
educational policy
experimental research
professional development
program evaluation
期刊
IF:
4.9
论文数:
1.1K
被引数:
9.0K
机构
引用论文
.png){kind=icon}
分享收藏What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers是什么让专业发展有效？来自全国教师样本的结果
PREAI
分享收藏分享收藏分享收藏
查看更多内容