.png){kind=icon}
返回
Proof constructions and evaluations
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1007/s10649-009-9191-3.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
In this article, we focus on a group of 39 prospective elementary (grades K-6) teachers who had rich experiences with proof, and we examine their ability to construct proofs and evaluate their own constructions. We claim that the combined construction-evaluation activity helps illuminate certain aspects of prospective teachers' and presumably other individuals' understanding of proof that tend to defy scrutiny when individuals are asked to evaluate given arguments. For example, some prospective teachers in our study provided empirical arguments to mathematical statements, while being aware that their constructions were invalid. Thus, although these constructions considered alone could have been taken as evidence of an empirical conception of proof, the additional consideration of prospective teachers' evaluations of their own constructions overruled this interpretation and suggested a good understanding of the distinction between proofs and empirical arguments. We offer a possible account of our findings, and we discuss implications for research and instruction.
Keyword:
Logic
Mathematical reasoning
Proof
Proof construction
Teacher education
Teacher knowledge
期刊
IF:
1.9
论文数:
1.5K
被引数:
3.8K
机构
引用论文
A New Zn(II) Azido Complex of L-Arginine: X-ray Crystal Structure, Hirshfeld, and AIM Studies一种新型L-精氨酸的Zn(II)叠氮配合物：X射线晶体结构、Hirshfeld和AIM研究.png)
Crystals
OAAI
CrystalsIF0
OAAI分享收藏分享收藏Effects of teachers' mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement教师数学教学知识对学生成绩的影响
PREAI
分享收藏
查看更多内容