arrow
返回

Testing After Worked Example Study Does Not Enhance Delayed Problem-Solving Performance Compared to Restudy

delete2015-02-24
delete24
delete
OA
AI
T
Tamara van Gog *
L
Liesbeth Kester
K
Kim Dirkx
V
Vincent Hoogerheide
J
Joris Boerboom
P
Peter P. J. L. Verkoeijen
DOI:10.1007/s10648-015-9297-3delete
delete原文链接
delete分享
delete收藏
查看原文
摘要

摘要

En 中文
Four experiments investigated whether the testing effect also applies to the acquisition of problem-solving skills from worked examples. Experiment 1 (n = 120) showed no beneficial effects of testing consisting of isomorphic problem solving or example recall on final test performance, which consisted of isomorphic problem solving, compared to continued study of isomorphic examples. Experiment 2 (n = 124) showed no beneficial effects of testing consisting of identical problem solving compared to restudying an identical example. Interestingly, participants who took both an immediate and a delayed final test outperformed those taking only a delayed test. This finding suggested that testing might become beneficial for retention but only after a certain level of schema acquisition has taken place through restudying several examples. However, experiment 2 had no control condition restudying examples instead of taking the immediate test. Experiment 3 (n = 129) included such a restudy condition, and there was no evidence that testing after studying four examples was more effective for final delayed test performance than restudying, regardless of whether restudied/tested problems were isomorphic or identical. Experiment 4 (n = 75) used a similar design as experiment 3 (i.e., testing/restudy after four examples), but with examples on a different topic and with a different participant population. Again, no evidence of a testing effect was found. Thus, across four experiments, with different types of initial tests, different problem-solving domains, and different participant populations, we found no evidence that testing enhanced delayed test performance compared to restudy. These findings suggest that the testing effect might not apply to acquiring problem-solving skills from worked examples.
Keyword:
Testing effect
Worked examples
Problem solving
AI总结

AI总结

对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。

期刊

Educational Psychology Review 封面图
Educational Psychology Review
IF:
8.8
论文数:
1.5K
被引数:
1.3W

机构

E
Erasmus University Rotterdam
学者数:
4.6W
论文数: 4.0W
被引数: 2.4W
E
erasmus university rotterdam - excl erasmus mc
学者数:
5.5K
论文数: 5.7K
被引数: 6
引用论文

引用论文

err分享
err收藏
Plinian and Subplinian Eruptions
err2015-01-01
err0
errOAAI
errRaffaello Cioni; Marco Pistolesi; Mauro Rosi
err分享
err收藏
err分享
err收藏
Generalizing test-enhanced learning from the laboratory to the classroom
err2007-04-01
err278
errOAAI
errMcDaniel, Mark A.; Roediger, Henry L., III; McDermott, Kathleen B.
err分享
err收藏
err分享
err收藏
err分享
err收藏
学者 查看更多内容