arrow
返回

What if learning analytics were based on learning science?

delete2016-12-15
delete64
delete
OA
AI
Z
Zahia Marzouk *
M
Mladen Raković
A
Amna Liaqat
J
Jovita Vytasek
D
Donya Samadi
J
Jason Stewart-Alonso
I
Ilana Ram
S
Sonya Woloshen
P
Philip H. Winne
J
John C. Nesbit
DOI:10.14742/ajet.3058delete
delete原文链接
delete原文求助
delete分享
delete收藏
摘要

摘要

En 中文
Learning analytics are often formatted as visualisations developed from traced data collected as students study in online learning environments. Optimal analytics inform and motivate students' decisions about adaptations that improve their learning. We observe that designs for learning often neglect theories and empirical findings in learning science that explain how students learn. We present six learning analytics that reflect what is known in six areas (we call them cases) of theory and research findings in the learning sciences: setting goals and monitoring progress, distributed practice, retrieval practice, prior knowledge for reading, comparative evaluation of writing, and collaborative learning. Our designs demonstrate learning analytics can be grounded in research on self-regulated learning and self-determination. We propose designs for learning analytics in general should guide students toward more effective self-regulated learning and promote motivation through perceptions of autonomy, competence, and relatedness.
Keyword:
SELF-DETERMINATION THEORY
MOTIVATION
KNOWLEDGE
COMPREHENSION
ENGAGEMENT
PRINCIPLES
RETRIEVAL
RECALL
MEMORY
TESTS

期刊

Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 封面图
Australasian Journal of Educational Technology
IF:
4.2
论文数:
511
被引数:
2.8K

机构

S
Simon Fraser University
学者数:
1.0W
论文数: 1.0W
被引数: 1.4W
引用论文

引用论文

暂无论文信息