.png){kind=icon}
返回
Equal or equitable pay? Individual differences in pay fairness perceptions
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1002/hrm.21944.png)
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
This study examined how social comparison (i.e., comparing one's pay to similar others' pay) and deserved comparison (i.e., comparing one's pay to one's deserved pay) affect pay fairness perceptions, and the individual differences in the comparison processes. Results based on a field study with a sample of 167 employees showed pay fairness was low when employees received lower pay than a similar other (or what they deserved), increased as their pay exceeded that of a similar other (or deserved pay) to some extent, and then decreased when overpayment was considerable. Second, pay fairness increased as one's actual and similar others' pay levels both increased while pay fairness remained the same as one's actual and the deserved pay levels both increased. In addition, the threshold that people start to perceive overpayment as less fair occurred more quickly for those with higher preference for consistency in social comparison and for those with higher preference for the merit principle in deserved comparison. We also conducted experiments, and the results generally replicated the findings in the field study. These findings offer theoretical implications regarding organizational justice, as well as practical implications for designing and executing a compensation system.
Keyword:
deserved comparison
pay fairness
preference for consistency
preference for the merit principle
social comparison
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
13
论文数:
2.6K
被引数:
7.2K
机构
引用论文
.png){kind=icon}
Justice and personality: Using integrative theories to derive moderators of justice effects正义与人格: 使用综合理论得出正义效应的调节因素OAAI
OAAI分享收藏分享收藏Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies行为研究中常见的方法偏差: 对文献的批判性回顾和建议的补救措施
PREAI
分享收藏
查看更多内容