返回
Implementing programmatic assessment transforms supervisor attitudes: An explanatory sequential mixed methods study
DOI:10.1080/0142159X.2021.1893678.png)
摘要
En 中文
Introduction Programmatic assessment (PA) is an increasingly popular approach to competency-based assessment (CBA), yet evaluation evidence is limited. This study aimed to identify and explore supervisor attitudes before and after implementing a novel PA using a sequential explanatory mixed methods design. In phase one, a survey was used to identify supervisor perspectives on work-based placements, PA and CBA. Survey results were then applied to develop focus group questions to further explore supervisor attitudes. Results PA was found to improve supervisor-student relationships by removing high-stakes assessment decisions and creating greater capacity for feedback and teaching, leading to a productive learning environment. Assessment was perceived as an important role and supervisors wanted to feel valued and heard within PA. Trust was conceptualised as a triad between supervisor, student and university, and enabled supervisors to engage with PA which was important for success. Supervisor learning of PA was experiential and often supported by students, highlighting the need for hands-on training. Conclusion Participants reported a high level of agreement with PA and CBA principles which may have made them amenable to educational change. Further research is needed to explore the experience of all stakeholders and to understand how worldviews and culture influence assessment initiatives.
Keyword:
Roles of teacher
other
assessment
best evidence medical education
student support
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
M
IF:
4.4
论文数:
6.6K
被引数:
1.4W
机构
引用论文
Now I see it, now I don't: researcher's position and reflexivity in qualitative research现在我看到了,现在我没有: 定性研究中研究者的地位和反身性
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH
IF2.9

