arrow
Return

A community effort to create standards for evaluating tumor subclonal reconstruction

delete2020-01-09
delete53
delete
OA
AI
A
Adriana Salcedo
M
Maxime Tarabichi
E
Espiritu, Shadrielle Melijah G.
D
Deshwar, Amit G.
D
David, Matei
N
Nathan M. Wilson
S
Stefan C. Dentro
J
Jeff Wintersinger
L
Lydia Liu
M
Minjeong Ko
S
Srinivasan Sivanandan
H
Hongjiu Zhang
K
Kaiyi Zhu
T
Tai-Hsien Ou Yang
J
John Chilton
B
Buchanan, Alex
C
Christopher M. Lalansingh
P
P'ng, Christine
C
Catalina Anghel
U
Umar, Imaad
L
Lo, Bryan
Z
Zou, William
J
Jared T. Simpson
J
Joshua M. Stuart
D
Dimitris Anastassiou
Y
Yuanfang Guan
A
Adam D. Ewing
K
Kyle Ellrott
D
David C. Wedge
Q
Quaid Morris
P
Peter Van Loo
P
Paul C. Boutros *
J
Jha, Alokkumar
H
Huang, Tanxiao
Y
Yang, Tsun-Po
P
Peifer, Martin
S
Sahinalp, Cenk
M
Malikic, Salem
V
Vazquez-Garcia, Ignacio
V
Ville Mustonen
Y
Yang, Hsih-Te
L
Lee, Ken-Ray
J
Ji, Yuan
S
Sengupta, Subhajit
R
Rudewicz, Justine
M
Macha Nikolski
Q
Q. Schaeverbeke
Y
Yuan, Ke
M
Markowetz, Florian
M
Macintyre, Geoff
C
Cmero, Marek
C
Chaudhary, Belal
L
Leshchiner, Ignaty
L
Livitz, Dimitri
G
Getz, Gad
L
Loher, Phillipe
Y
Yu, Kaixian
W
Wenyi Wang
Z
Zhu, Hongtu
DOI:10.1038/s41587-019-0364-zdelete
deleteOriginal
deleteShare
deleteSave
View PDF
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Methods for reconstructing tumor evolution are benchmarked in the DREAM Somatic Mutation Calling Tumour Heterogeneity Challenge. Tumor DNA sequencing data can be interpreted by computational methods that analyze genomic heterogeneity to infer evolutionary dynamics. A growing number of studies have used these approaches to link cancer evolution with clinical progression and response to therapy. Although the inference of tumor phylogenies is rapidly becoming standard practice in cancer genome analyses, standards for evaluating them are lacking. To address this need, we systematically assess methods for reconstructing tumor subclonality. First, we elucidate the main algorithmic problems in subclonal reconstruction and develop quantitative metrics for evaluating them. Then we simulate realistic tumor genomes that harbor all known clonal and subclonal mutation types and processes. Finally, we benchmark 580 tumor reconstructions, varying tumor read depth, tumor type and somatic variant detection. Our analysis provides a baseline for the establishment of gold-standard methods to analyze tumor heterogeneity.
Keywords:
SOMATIC POINT MUTATIONS
GENOME SIMULATION
CANCER
HETEROGENEITY
EVOLUTION
IDENTIFICATION
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

Nature Biotechnology cover
Nature Biotechnology
IF:
41.7
Papers:
1.2W
Citations:
10.1W

Organization

I
indiana university system
Scholars:
3.9W
Papers: 3.5W
Citations: 38
U
university of helsinki
Scholars:
4.1W
Papers: 3.6W
Citations: 51
C
Columbia University
Scholars:
7.1W
Papers: 6.4W
Citations: 263
U
university of california santa cruz
Scholars:
8.6K
Papers: 6.8K
Citations: 32
U
University of Cologne
Scholars:
2.9W
Papers: 2.1W
Citations: 2.4W
V
Vector Institute for Artificial Intelligence
Scholars:
215
Papers: 162
Citations: 4
S
Simon Fraser University
Scholars:
1.0W
Papers: 1.0W
Citations: 1.4W
U
university of california los angeles
Scholars:
5.3W
Papers: 4.2W
Citations: 89
P
Pennsylvania State University
Scholars:
3.0W
Papers: 2.6W
Citations: 7.2W
I
Indiana University Bloomington
Scholars:
1.9W
Papers: 1.5W
Citations: 2.8W
U
University of Cambridge
Scholars:
7.7W
Papers: 7.1W
Citations: 13.7W
K
KU Leuven
Scholars:
5.7W
Papers: 5.2W
Citations: 8.1W
P
pennsylvania commonwealth system of higher education (pcshe)
Scholars:
12.8W
Papers: 11.7W
Citations: 177
University of California System cover
University of California System
Scholars:
37.2W
Papers: 33.6W
Citations: 6.6K
U
UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center
Scholars:
942
Papers: 673
Citations: 3.1K
M
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Scholars:
3.4W
Papers: 2.4W
Citations: 4.6W
O
Ontario Institute for Cancer Research
Scholars:
1.3K
Papers: 689
Citations: 4.6K
U
University of Michigan
Scholars:
6.4W
Papers: 5.3W
Citations: 124
W
wellcome trust sanger institute
Scholars:
6.9K
Papers: 4.3K
Citations: 17
U
university of michigan system
Scholars:
9.0W
Papers: 8.6W
Citations: 133
T
taipei medical university
Scholars:
1.4W
Papers: 1.2W
Citations: 11
U
university of toronto
Scholars:
14.5W
Papers: 11.9W
Citations: 165
researcher View more organizations