arrow
返回

Ottawa 2020 consensus statements for programmatic assessment 2: Implementation and practice

delete2021-07-30
delete25
delete
OA
AI
D
Dario Torre *
N
Neil Rice
A
Anna Ryan
H
Harold G. J. Bok
L
Luke Dawson
B
Beth Bierer
T
Tim Wilkinson
G
Glendon R. Tait
T
Tom Laughlin
K
Kiran Veerapen
S
Sylvia Heeneman
A
Adrian Freeman
C
Cees van der Vleuten
DOI:10.1080/0142159X.2021.1956681delete
delete原文链接
delete分享
delete收藏
查看原文
摘要

摘要

En 中文
Introduction Programmatic assessment is a longitudinal, developmental approach that fosters and harnesses the learning function of assessment. Yet the implementation, a critical step to translate theory into practice, can be challenging. As part of the Ottawa 2020 consensus statement on programmatic assessment, we sought to provide descriptions of the implementation of the 12 principles of programmatic assessment and to gain insight into enablers and barriers across different institutions and contexts. Methods After the 2020 Ottawa conference, we surveyed 15 Health Profession Education programmes from six different countries about the implementation of the 12 principles of programmatic assessment. Survey responses were analysed using a deductive thematic analysis. Results and Discussion A wide range of implementations were reported although the principles remained, for the most part, faithful to the original enunciation and rationale. Enablers included strong leadership support, ongoing faculty development, providing students with clear expectations about assessment, simultaneous curriculum renewal and organisational commitment to change. Most barriers were related to the need for a paradigm shift in the culture of assessment. Descriptions of implementations in relation to the theoretical principles, across multiple educational contexts, coupled with explanations of enablers and barriers, provided new insights and a clearer understanding of the strategic and operational considerations in the implementation of programmatic assessment. Future research is needed to further explore how contextual and cultural factors affect implementation.
Keyword:
Assessment
feedback
theory
general
portfolio
AI总结

AI总结

对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。

期刊

M
Medical Teacher
IF:
4.4
论文数:
6.6K
被引数:
1.4W

机构

U
University System of Ohio
学者数:
15.4W
论文数: 13.0W
被引数: 200
U
uniformed services university of the health sciences - usa
学者数:
5.9K
论文数: 4.5K
被引数: 3
U
Utrecht University
学者数:
6.0W
论文数: 5.1W
被引数: 5.8W
U
University of Exeter
学者数:
2.0W
论文数: 2.1W
被引数: 3.6W
C
Case Western Reserve University
学者数:
2.1W
论文数: 1.6W
被引数: 3.4W
U
University of Liverpool
学者数:
2.8W
论文数: 2.5W
被引数: 3.5W
C
cleveland clinic foundation
学者数:
3.7W
论文数: 3.0W
被引数: 29
D
Dalhousie University
学者数:
2.0W
论文数: 1.8W
被引数: 2.3W
U
university of melbourne
学者数:
5.7W
论文数: 5.4W
被引数: 69
U
university of toronto
学者数:
14.8W
论文数: 12.0W
被引数: 165
学者 查看更多机构
引用论文

引用论文

A model for programmatic assessment fit for purpose
err2012-02-25
err242
PREAI
errvan der Vleuten, C. P. M.; Schuwirth, L. W. T.; Driessen, E. W.; Dijkstra, J.; Tigelaar, D.; Baartman, L. K. J.; van Tartwijk, J.
err分享
err收藏
Twelve Tips for programmatic assessment
err2014-11-20
err207
PREAI
errvan der Vleuten, C. P. M.; Schuwirth, L. W. T.; Driessen, E. W.; Govaerts, M. J. B.; Heeneman, S.
err分享
err收藏
Where the rubber meets the road - An integrative review of programmatic assessment in health care professions education
err2020-10-21
err69
errOAAI
errSchut, Suzanne; Maggio, Lauren A.; Heeneman, Sylvia; van Tartwijk, Jan; van der Vleuten, Cees; Driessen, Erik
err分享
err收藏
err分享
err收藏
err分享
err收藏
The use of programmatic assessment in the clinical workplace: A Maastricht case report
err2012-02-25
err77
PREAI
errDriessen, Erik W.; van Tartwijk, Jan; Govaerts, Marjan; Teunissen, Pim; van der Vleuten, Cees P. M.
err分享
err收藏
The impact of programmatic assessment on student learning: theory versus practice
err2015-04-28
err149
PREAI
errHeeneman, Sylvia; Pool, Andrea Oudkerk; Schuwirth, Lambert W. T.; van der Vleuten, Cees P. M.; Driessen, Erik W.
err分享
err收藏
学者 查看更多内容